A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials
Abstract Background The World Health Organization recommends that a randomised controlled trial (RCT) publishes its results in a peer-reviewed journal within 24 months of study completion. When RCTs are not published or publication is delayed, this can contribute to publication bias, which is the te...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ameer Hohlfeld, Tamara Kredo, Michael Clarke |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Nurse-led randomised controlled trials in the perioperative setting: A scoping review
by: Judy Munday, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Process evaluations nested in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: a scoping review of approaches and reporting
by: Maartje Kletter, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Tolerating bad health research (part 2): still as many bad trials, but more good ones too
by: Anna Daly, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Mapping the reporting practices in recent randomised controlled trials published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: A scoping review of methodological quality
by: Aleksandra Królikowska, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
A review of the statistical analysis of randomised controlled trials conducted within OCTRU
by: Alexander Ooms, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)