Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework
<p>Although heatwaves are one of the most dangerous types of weather-related hazards, their underlying mechanisms are not yet sufficiently understood. In particular, there is still no scientific consensus about the relative importance of the three key processes: horizontal temperature transpor...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Weather and Climate Dynamics |
| Online Access: | https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/6/131/2025/wcd-6-131-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832582650657767424 |
|---|---|
| author | A. Mayer V. Wirth |
| author_facet | A. Mayer V. Wirth |
| author_sort | A. Mayer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Although heatwaves are one of the most dangerous types of weather-related hazards, their underlying mechanisms are not yet sufficiently understood. In particular, there is still no scientific consensus about the relative importance of the three key processes: horizontal temperature transport, subsidence accompanied by adiabatic heating, and diabatic heating. The current study quantifies these processes using an Eulerian method based on tracer advection, which allows one to extract Lagrangian information. For each grid point at any time, the method yields a decomposition of temperature anomalies into the aforementioned processes, complemented by the contribution of a pre-existing anomaly. Two different approaches for this decomposition are employed. The first approach is based on the full fields of the respective terms and has been established in prior research. In contrast, the second approach is based on the anomaly fields of the respective terms, i.e. deviations from their corresponding climatologies, and is introduced in this study. The two approaches offer two distinct perspectives on the same subject matter. By analysing two recent heatwaves, it is shown that the two decompositions yield substantial differences regarding the relative importance of the processes. A statistical analysis indicates that these differences are not coincidental but are characteristic of the respective regions. We conclude that the Lagrangian characterization of heatwaves is a matter of perspective.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a9e1c0efaf2a49b6bd07d092ed219895 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2698-4016 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Weather and Climate Dynamics |
| spelling | doaj-art-a9e1c0efaf2a49b6bd07d092ed2198952025-01-29T13:48:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsWeather and Climate Dynamics2698-40162025-01-01613115010.5194/wcd-6-131-2025Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian frameworkA. Mayer0V. Wirth1Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Becherweg 21, 55126 Mainz, GermanyInstitute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Becherweg 21, 55126 Mainz, Germany<p>Although heatwaves are one of the most dangerous types of weather-related hazards, their underlying mechanisms are not yet sufficiently understood. In particular, there is still no scientific consensus about the relative importance of the three key processes: horizontal temperature transport, subsidence accompanied by adiabatic heating, and diabatic heating. The current study quantifies these processes using an Eulerian method based on tracer advection, which allows one to extract Lagrangian information. For each grid point at any time, the method yields a decomposition of temperature anomalies into the aforementioned processes, complemented by the contribution of a pre-existing anomaly. Two different approaches for this decomposition are employed. The first approach is based on the full fields of the respective terms and has been established in prior research. In contrast, the second approach is based on the anomaly fields of the respective terms, i.e. deviations from their corresponding climatologies, and is introduced in this study. The two approaches offer two distinct perspectives on the same subject matter. By analysing two recent heatwaves, it is shown that the two decompositions yield substantial differences regarding the relative importance of the processes. A statistical analysis indicates that these differences are not coincidental but are characteristic of the respective regions. We conclude that the Lagrangian characterization of heatwaves is a matter of perspective.</p>https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/6/131/2025/wcd-6-131-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | A. Mayer V. Wirth Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework Weather and Climate Dynamics |
| title | Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework |
| title_full | Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework |
| title_fullStr | Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework |
| title_full_unstemmed | Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework |
| title_short | Two different perspectives on heatwaves within the Lagrangian framework |
| title_sort | two different perspectives on heatwaves within the lagrangian framework |
| url | https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/6/131/2025/wcd-6-131-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amayer twodifferentperspectivesonheatwaveswithinthelagrangianframework AT vwirth twodifferentperspectivesonheatwaveswithinthelagrangianframework |