Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance

This paper asks whether ambiguity avoidance influences the use of certain linguistic forms, using noun juxtaposition as a case study. Noun juxtaposition is one of the strategies for expressing predication, possession, and conjunction, and is widely used across the world’s languages. Despite its exte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shogo Mizuno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2025-01-01
Series:Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Subjects:
Online Access:https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18271
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576147968229376
author Shogo Mizuno
author_facet Shogo Mizuno
author_sort Shogo Mizuno
collection DOAJ
description This paper asks whether ambiguity avoidance influences the use of certain linguistic forms, using noun juxtaposition as a case study. Noun juxtaposition is one of the strategies for expressing predication, possession, and conjunction, and is widely used across the world’s languages. Despite its extensive use, few studies have investigated noun juxtaposition cross-linguistically. One notable exception is Frajzyngier et al. (2002), who argue that the use of noun juxtaposition is constrained within a single language due to ambiguity avoidance. However, counterexamples to this hypothesis exist. This study points out that their sample is skewed towards African languages, and thus, their findings likely reflect African areal patterns. From this perspective, a comprehensive cross-linguistic examination of noun juxtaposition is still lacking. Therefore, based on a balanced 72-language sample, this paper explores which functions tend to be expressed by noun juxtaposition, whether there are any areal patterns concerning its use, and whether its use is constrained by ambiguity. Since noun juxtaposition is, by definition, the most efficient strategy for these three functions in terms of formal complexity, the research conducted in this study contributes to discussions on whether ambiguity or efficiency is more important for the use of certain linguistic forms. Based on the empirical findings, this study suggests that efficiency plays a more important role than ambiguity.
format Article
id doaj-art-a9d6e9d87dfa45b0a3dec010ab2a133d
institution Kabale University
issn 2785-0943
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher University of Bologna
record_format Article
series Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
spelling doaj-art-a9d6e9d87dfa45b0a3dec010ab2a133d2025-01-31T10:34:03ZengUniversity of BolognaLinguistic Typology at the Crossroads2785-09432025-01-014222027210.6092/issn.2785-0943/1827116630Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidanceShogo Mizuno0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3189-4035Leipzig University / Kyoto UniversityThis paper asks whether ambiguity avoidance influences the use of certain linguistic forms, using noun juxtaposition as a case study. Noun juxtaposition is one of the strategies for expressing predication, possession, and conjunction, and is widely used across the world’s languages. Despite its extensive use, few studies have investigated noun juxtaposition cross-linguistically. One notable exception is Frajzyngier et al. (2002), who argue that the use of noun juxtaposition is constrained within a single language due to ambiguity avoidance. However, counterexamples to this hypothesis exist. This study points out that their sample is skewed towards African languages, and thus, their findings likely reflect African areal patterns. From this perspective, a comprehensive cross-linguistic examination of noun juxtaposition is still lacking. Therefore, based on a balanced 72-language sample, this paper explores which functions tend to be expressed by noun juxtaposition, whether there are any areal patterns concerning its use, and whether its use is constrained by ambiguity. Since noun juxtaposition is, by definition, the most efficient strategy for these three functions in terms of formal complexity, the research conducted in this study contributes to discussions on whether ambiguity or efficiency is more important for the use of certain linguistic forms. Based on the empirical findings, this study suggests that efficiency plays a more important role than ambiguity.https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18271noun juxtapostionambiguityefficiencypredicationpossessionconjunction
spellingShingle Shogo Mizuno
Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
noun juxtapostion
ambiguity
efficiency
predication
possession
conjunction
title Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
title_full Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
title_fullStr Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
title_full_unstemmed Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
title_short Noun juxtaposition for predication, possession, and conjunction: Beyond ambiguity avoidance
title_sort noun juxtaposition for predication possession and conjunction beyond ambiguity avoidance
topic noun juxtapostion
ambiguity
efficiency
predication
possession
conjunction
url https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18271
work_keys_str_mv AT shogomizuno nounjuxtapositionforpredicationpossessionandconjunctionbeyondambiguityavoidance