Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate how surgical management strategies for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have changed in a single-centre department over the last decade, as Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings have changed worldwide attitudes to mesh augmented reconstruction. MA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrycja Pietak, Konrad Futyma, Ewa Rechberger-Krolikowska, Aleksandra Struzyk, Aleksandra Kolodynska, Tomasz Rechberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Via Medica 2025-07-01
Series:Ginekologia Polska
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/104105
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849230400827686912
author Patrycja Pietak
Konrad Futyma
Ewa Rechberger-Krolikowska
Aleksandra Struzyk
Aleksandra Kolodynska
Tomasz Rechberger
author_facet Patrycja Pietak
Konrad Futyma
Ewa Rechberger-Krolikowska
Aleksandra Struzyk
Aleksandra Kolodynska
Tomasz Rechberger
author_sort Patrycja Pietak
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate how surgical management strategies for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have changed in a single-centre department over the last decade, as Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings have changed worldwide attitudes to mesh augmented reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 4180 patients who were operated on due to advanced symptomatic POP (≥ 2 POP-Q scale) from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the type of POP vaginal surgery performed: group 1 — vaginal native tissue repair (VNTR) — (n = 1376); group 2 — transvaginal mesh repair (TVM; anterior, posterior, or both) — (n = 2494), and group 3 — transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) — (n = 310). The clinical effectiveness of each type of procedure was estimated by means of the NIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network criteria. RESULTS: The number of VNTR surgeries has significantly increased since 2017, following FDA warnings about the safety of these surgeries. The reoperation rate during the follow-up period did not differ between the investigated groups. However, urgency occurrence was significantly lower in the VNTR group when compared to the TVM and TVH groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In most cases of symptomatic POP, vaginal native tissue repair is a safe and effective primary treatment. Based on the reoperation rate and the functional outcome we have not found any evidence of benefits from augmenting surgical prolapse repairs with polypropylene mesh inlays.
format Article
id doaj-art-a952f0cbe0e34dbb8383bc76af7f8531
institution Kabale University
issn 0017-0011
2543-6767
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Via Medica
record_format Article
series Ginekologia Polska
spelling doaj-art-a952f0cbe0e34dbb8383bc76af7f85312025-08-21T06:11:41ZengVia MedicaGinekologia Polska0017-00112543-67672025-07-0196710.5603/gpl.104105Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgeryPatrycja Pietak0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-2130Konrad Futyma1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-666XEwa Rechberger-Krolikowska2Aleksandra Struzyk3Aleksandra Kolodynska4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-5594Tomasz Rechberger5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4138-332XII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandII Department of Gynecology; Medical University of Lublin, Poland, PolandOBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate how surgical management strategies for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have changed in a single-centre department over the last decade, as Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings have changed worldwide attitudes to mesh augmented reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 4180 patients who were operated on due to advanced symptomatic POP (≥ 2 POP-Q scale) from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the type of POP vaginal surgery performed: group 1 — vaginal native tissue repair (VNTR) — (n = 1376); group 2 — transvaginal mesh repair (TVM; anterior, posterior, or both) — (n = 2494), and group 3 — transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) — (n = 310). The clinical effectiveness of each type of procedure was estimated by means of the NIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network criteria. RESULTS: The number of VNTR surgeries has significantly increased since 2017, following FDA warnings about the safety of these surgeries. The reoperation rate during the follow-up period did not differ between the investigated groups. However, urgency occurrence was significantly lower in the VNTR group when compared to the TVM and TVH groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In most cases of symptomatic POP, vaginal native tissue repair is a safe and effective primary treatment. Based on the reoperation rate and the functional outcome we have not found any evidence of benefits from augmenting surgical prolapse repairs with polypropylene mesh inlays.https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/104105pelvic organ prolapsevaginal mesh repairvaginal native tissue repairtransvaginal hysterectomyreconstructive surgerylower urinary tract symptoms
spellingShingle Patrycja Pietak
Konrad Futyma
Ewa Rechberger-Krolikowska
Aleksandra Struzyk
Aleksandra Kolodynska
Tomasz Rechberger
Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
Ginekologia Polska
pelvic organ prolapse
vaginal mesh repair
vaginal native tissue repair
transvaginal hysterectomy
reconstructive surgery
lower urinary tract symptoms
title Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
title_full Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
title_fullStr Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
title_full_unstemmed Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
title_short Should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman’s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery? — 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
title_sort should we abandon the use of transvaginal mesh in woman s pelvic floor reconstructive surgery 10 years of experience in the field of vaginal pelvic floor surgery
topic pelvic organ prolapse
vaginal mesh repair
vaginal native tissue repair
transvaginal hysterectomy
reconstructive surgery
lower urinary tract symptoms
url https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/104105
work_keys_str_mv AT patrycjapietak shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery
AT konradfutyma shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery
AT ewarechbergerkrolikowska shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery
AT aleksandrastruzyk shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery
AT aleksandrakolodynska shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery
AT tomaszrechberger shouldweabandontheuseoftransvaginalmeshinwomanspelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery10yearsofexperienceinthefieldofvaginalpelvicfloorsurgery