Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils

This study analysed the effects of controlled drainage, peat layer thickness and hydrological connections on the hydrology of agricultural peatlands. A hydrological model was combined with a comprehensive field-scale dataset, consisting of several field plots with controlled and regular subsurface d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mika Tähtikarhu, Timo A. Räsänen, Jari Hyväluoma, Arndt Piayda, M. Myllys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09064710.2025.2454388
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584196878499840
author Mika Tähtikarhu
Timo A. Räsänen
Jari Hyväluoma
Arndt Piayda
M. Myllys
author_facet Mika Tähtikarhu
Timo A. Räsänen
Jari Hyväluoma
Arndt Piayda
M. Myllys
author_sort Mika Tähtikarhu
collection DOAJ
description This study analysed the effects of controlled drainage, peat layer thickness and hydrological connections on the hydrology of agricultural peatlands. A hydrological model was combined with a comprehensive field-scale dataset, consisting of several field plots with controlled and regular subsurface drainage, and with varying peat thickness. Controlled drainage markedly reduced the amount of drain discharge (up to 862 mm) during the 1.5-year simulation period, while the consequent increase in groundwater levels was modest (mean difference 0.01–0.17 and 0.10–0.21 m in thin and thick peat, respectively). Thus, controlled drainage can change flow routes, and the impact on the groundwater table can depend on the related groundwater out- and influxes. Controlled subsurface drainage had a higher potential to increase groundwater levels in areas with thick peat soils and steep upslope than in areas with a shallow peat layer and steep downslope areas. If the soils are drained efficiently during the spring, controlled drainage cannot increase groundwater levels during the following growing season if the amount of evapotranspiration exceeds the amount of precipitation and influxes. The model application complemented the knowledge gained from the empirical data. Furthermore, our analysis shows knowledge gaps regarding the hydrology of agricultural peatlands.
format Article
id doaj-art-a93b1325d9a1431f8ed333e248e15bc8
institution Kabale University
issn 0906-4710
1651-1913
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
spelling doaj-art-a93b1325d9a1431f8ed333e248e15bc82025-01-27T14:54:38ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science0906-47101651-19132025-12-0175110.1080/09064710.2025.2454388Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soilsMika Tähtikarhu0Timo A. Räsänen1Jari Hyväluoma2Arndt Piayda3M. Myllys4Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, FinlandNatural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, FinlandNatural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, FinlandThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, GermanyNatural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, FinlandThis study analysed the effects of controlled drainage, peat layer thickness and hydrological connections on the hydrology of agricultural peatlands. A hydrological model was combined with a comprehensive field-scale dataset, consisting of several field plots with controlled and regular subsurface drainage, and with varying peat thickness. Controlled drainage markedly reduced the amount of drain discharge (up to 862 mm) during the 1.5-year simulation period, while the consequent increase in groundwater levels was modest (mean difference 0.01–0.17 and 0.10–0.21 m in thin and thick peat, respectively). Thus, controlled drainage can change flow routes, and the impact on the groundwater table can depend on the related groundwater out- and influxes. Controlled subsurface drainage had a higher potential to increase groundwater levels in areas with thick peat soils and steep upslope than in areas with a shallow peat layer and steep downslope areas. If the soils are drained efficiently during the spring, controlled drainage cannot increase groundwater levels during the following growing season if the amount of evapotranspiration exceeds the amount of precipitation and influxes. The model application complemented the knowledge gained from the empirical data. Furthermore, our analysis shows knowledge gaps regarding the hydrology of agricultural peatlands.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09064710.2025.2454388Subsurface drainagepeatlandagricultural water managementlateral flow
spellingShingle Mika Tähtikarhu
Timo A. Räsänen
Jari Hyväluoma
Arndt Piayda
M. Myllys
Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
Subsurface drainage
peatland
agricultural water management
lateral flow
title Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
title_full Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
title_fullStr Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
title_full_unstemmed Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
title_short Analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage, peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
title_sort analysing hydrological impacts of controlled drainage peat thickness and groundwater fluxes in cultivated peat soils
topic Subsurface drainage
peatland
agricultural water management
lateral flow
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09064710.2025.2454388
work_keys_str_mv AT mikatahtikarhu analysinghydrologicalimpactsofcontrolleddrainagepeatthicknessandgroundwaterfluxesincultivatedpeatsoils
AT timoarasanen analysinghydrologicalimpactsofcontrolleddrainagepeatthicknessandgroundwaterfluxesincultivatedpeatsoils
AT jarihyvaluoma analysinghydrologicalimpactsofcontrolleddrainagepeatthicknessandgroundwaterfluxesincultivatedpeatsoils
AT arndtpiayda analysinghydrologicalimpactsofcontrolleddrainagepeatthicknessandgroundwaterfluxesincultivatedpeatsoils
AT mmyllys analysinghydrologicalimpactsofcontrolleddrainagepeatthicknessandgroundwaterfluxesincultivatedpeatsoils