What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics

The aim of this contribution is to explore some of the ways in which cultural studies, and more specifically affect studies and feminist new materialisms, have dealt with the problem of depression. My main argument is that, through these approaches and discussions, depression becomes a powerful site...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Renata Prati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cultural Studies Association 2025-05-01
Series:Lateral
Subjects:
Online Access:https://csalateral.org/section/aporias/what-should-we-do-with-our-depressions-feelings-biology-politics-prati/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849387097202360320
author Renata Prati
author_facet Renata Prati
author_sort Renata Prati
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this contribution is to explore some of the ways in which cultural studies, and more specifically affect studies and feminist new materialisms, have dealt with the problem of depression. My main argument is that, through these approaches and discussions, depression becomes a powerful site to delve into crucial controversies within affect theory and new materialisms, such as the distinction between affect and emotions and the related dichotomy between biology and culture, or the proper place of critique in contemporary thought. One glaring entry point to these controversies is the topic of antidepressants. In the 1990s, the so-called Decade of the Brain, a new generation of antidepressants took hold of the public imagination in the United States: the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, with Prozac (fluoxetine) on top. The 1990s also witnessed the emergence of both affect theory and new materialisms, and with them the shaping of some deep and enduring controversies. Indeed, almost twenty years later, these entangled debates were reenacted in two books: Ann Cvetkovich’s Depression: A Public Feeling (2012), originally prompted as a critical response to depression memoirs, and Elizabeth A. Wilson’s Gut Feminism (2015), strongly critical of what she considers to be the usual critique of antidepressants in cultural studies. Are antidepressants taking us closer to the true psychosomatic nature of bad feelings, or are they an insidious form of biopower? How should cultural studies, feminist, and queer work approach them? What do they say about depression and negative feelings in general? Are our feelings of distress mainly visceral and biological, or are they socially and culturally determined, or both? And how? How do the 1990s and 2010s controversies live on today?
format Article
id doaj-art-a92bef48e651492daad78e831a1b93bb
institution Kabale University
issn 2469-4053
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Cultural Studies Association
record_format Article
series Lateral
spelling doaj-art-a92bef48e651492daad78e831a1b93bb2025-08-20T03:55:22ZengCultural Studies AssociationLateral2469-40532025-05-0114110.25158/L14.1.7What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, PoliticsRenata Prati0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-3206National Scientific and Technical Research CouncilThe aim of this contribution is to explore some of the ways in which cultural studies, and more specifically affect studies and feminist new materialisms, have dealt with the problem of depression. My main argument is that, through these approaches and discussions, depression becomes a powerful site to delve into crucial controversies within affect theory and new materialisms, such as the distinction between affect and emotions and the related dichotomy between biology and culture, or the proper place of critique in contemporary thought. One glaring entry point to these controversies is the topic of antidepressants. In the 1990s, the so-called Decade of the Brain, a new generation of antidepressants took hold of the public imagination in the United States: the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, with Prozac (fluoxetine) on top. The 1990s also witnessed the emergence of both affect theory and new materialisms, and with them the shaping of some deep and enduring controversies. Indeed, almost twenty years later, these entangled debates were reenacted in two books: Ann Cvetkovich’s Depression: A Public Feeling (2012), originally prompted as a critical response to depression memoirs, and Elizabeth A. Wilson’s Gut Feminism (2015), strongly critical of what she considers to be the usual critique of antidepressants in cultural studies. Are antidepressants taking us closer to the true psychosomatic nature of bad feelings, or are they an insidious form of biopower? How should cultural studies, feminist, and queer work approach them? What do they say about depression and negative feelings in general? Are our feelings of distress mainly visceral and biological, or are they socially and culturally determined, or both? And how? How do the 1990s and 2010s controversies live on today?https://csalateral.org/section/aporias/what-should-we-do-with-our-depressions-feelings-biology-politics-prati/affect theoryantidepressantsdepressionmental healthnew materialismstuckness
spellingShingle Renata Prati
What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
Lateral
affect theory
antidepressants
depression
mental health
new materialism
stuckness
title What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
title_full What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
title_fullStr What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
title_full_unstemmed What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
title_short What Should We Do with Our Depressions? Feelings, Biology, Politics
title_sort what should we do with our depressions feelings biology politics
topic affect theory
antidepressants
depression
mental health
new materialism
stuckness
url https://csalateral.org/section/aporias/what-should-we-do-with-our-depressions-feelings-biology-politics-prati/
work_keys_str_mv AT renataprati whatshouldwedowithourdepressionsfeelingsbiologypolitics