Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet
This article argues that new media often get involved in struggles for new rights. The nascent book was involved in the struggle for religious freedom, the press has been engaged in the struggle for fairer political regimes and the Internet is used today as an instrument for the advocacy of new lib...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Johannesburg
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Communicare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1824 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593790945198080 |
|---|---|
| author | Jean Chalaby |
| author_facet | Jean Chalaby |
| author_sort | Jean Chalaby |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article argues that new media often get involved in struggles for new rights. The
nascent book was involved in the struggle for religious freedom, the press has been
engaged in the struggle for fairer political regimes and the Internet is used today as
an instrument for the advocacy of new liberties: the freedoms of intimacy. Communities
and individuals seek to gain rights related to the needs and preferences derived from
their self-identity. This article shows that the Internet is best suited to dealing with
issues associated with the self and intimacy than are other media. Taking the example
of sexual minorities who use cyberspace as an alternative public sphere, it argues that
it is particularly well adapted to two key practices that are essential to communitybuilding
and that can only take place in the public sphere: self-definition and political
mobilization. The article also shows how public authorities have always tried to censor new media
when used by minorities to demand new rights. It argues that censorship has become
increasingly efficient and that today's new media face a new means of censorship in
technology. The article illustrates the case with the rating and filtering software used
to censor cyberspace. Finally, it claims that the fight for new rights is part of the
process of individualization inherent to modernity.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a92b876842924248938efacda64f86e9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0259-0069 2957-7950 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | University of Johannesburg |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Communicare |
| spelling | doaj-art-a92b876842924248938efacda64f86e92025-01-20T08:50:37ZengUniversity of JohannesburgCommunicare0259-00692957-79502022-10-0121110.36615/jcsa.v21i1.1824Freedoms of intimacy and the InternetJean Chalaby0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-0361City University This article argues that new media often get involved in struggles for new rights. The nascent book was involved in the struggle for religious freedom, the press has been engaged in the struggle for fairer political regimes and the Internet is used today as an instrument for the advocacy of new liberties: the freedoms of intimacy. Communities and individuals seek to gain rights related to the needs and preferences derived from their self-identity. This article shows that the Internet is best suited to dealing with issues associated with the self and intimacy than are other media. Taking the example of sexual minorities who use cyberspace as an alternative public sphere, it argues that it is particularly well adapted to two key practices that are essential to communitybuilding and that can only take place in the public sphere: self-definition and political mobilization. The article also shows how public authorities have always tried to censor new media when used by minorities to demand new rights. It argues that censorship has become increasingly efficient and that today's new media face a new means of censorship in technology. The article illustrates the case with the rating and filtering software used to censor cyberspace. Finally, it claims that the fight for new rights is part of the process of individualization inherent to modernity. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1824InternetFreedoms of intimacynew rightsreligious freedomself-definition and political mobilizationpublic authorities |
| spellingShingle | Jean Chalaby Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet Communicare Internet Freedoms of intimacy new rights religious freedom self-definition and political mobilization public authorities |
| title | Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet |
| title_full | Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet |
| title_fullStr | Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet |
| title_full_unstemmed | Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet |
| title_short | Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet |
| title_sort | freedoms of intimacy and the internet |
| topic | Internet Freedoms of intimacy new rights religious freedom self-definition and political mobilization public authorities |
| url | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1824 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jeanchalaby freedomsofintimacyandtheinternet |