Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ?
As the subject of a major debate, lean presents two faces. On the one hand, the virtue of a thought which encompasses both the profitability of and improvement to work. On the other hand, that of a different form of taylorism which destroys worker’s health in another way. At the heart of this tensio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association Recherche et Pratique sur les Activités
2012-10-01
|
| Series: | Activités |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/activites/444 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850149803141365760 |
|---|---|
| author | Fabrice Bourgeois |
| author_facet | Fabrice Bourgeois |
| author_sort | Fabrice Bourgeois |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As the subject of a major debate, lean presents two faces. On the one hand, the virtue of a thought which encompasses both the profitability of and improvement to work. On the other hand, that of a different form of taylorism which destroys worker’s health in another way. At the heart of this tension, ergonomics is expected to take a stand: to denounce or to support the lean process? But in fact this binary choice is not the issue. Whatever the situation, the lean process can do what it has to do well or badly; the issue relates to its work pattern and to its representation of what “working” means. The ergonomics issue is totally different. In order to explain the tension, one must understand this discrepancy. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a8d057803d684d4ab2ac2fea1d9e355f |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1765-2723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-10-01 |
| publisher | Association Recherche et Pratique sur les Activités |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Activités |
| spelling | doaj-art-a8d057803d684d4ab2ac2fea1d9e355f2025-08-20T02:26:46ZengAssociation Recherche et Pratique sur les ActivitésActivités1765-27232012-10-019210.4000/activites.444Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ?Fabrice BourgeoisAs the subject of a major debate, lean presents two faces. On the one hand, the virtue of a thought which encompasses both the profitability of and improvement to work. On the other hand, that of a different form of taylorism which destroys worker’s health in another way. At the heart of this tension, ergonomics is expected to take a stand: to denounce or to support the lean process? But in fact this binary choice is not the issue. Whatever the situation, the lean process can do what it has to do well or badly; the issue relates to its work pattern and to its representation of what “working” means. The ergonomics issue is totally different. In order to explain the tension, one must understand this discrepancy.https://journals.openedition.org/activites/444ergonomicslean standardoccupational healthproductivity |
| spellingShingle | Fabrice Bourgeois Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? Activités ergonomics lean standard occupational health productivity |
| title | Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? |
| title_full | Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? |
| title_fullStr | Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? |
| title_short | Que fait l’ergonomie que le lean ne sait / ne veut pas voir ? |
| title_sort | que fait l ergonomie que le lean ne sait ne veut pas voir |
| topic | ergonomics lean standard occupational health productivity |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/activites/444 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fabricebourgeois quefaitlergonomiequeleleannesaitneveutpasvoir |