Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Levocabastine and azelastine are currently the only antihistamines available as nasal sprays for the topical therapy of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The present study was undertaken to compare the onset of action, efficacy and tolerability of these two agents in a total of 242 patients with this cond...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ralph Mösges, Joachim Spaeth, Ludger Klimek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1995-01-01
Series:Mediators of Inflammation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935195000780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849397747246956544
author Ralph Mösges
Joachim Spaeth
Ludger Klimek
author_facet Ralph Mösges
Joachim Spaeth
Ludger Klimek
author_sort Ralph Mösges
collection DOAJ
description Levocabastine and azelastine are currently the only antihistamines available as nasal sprays for the topical therapy of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The present study was undertaken to compare the onset of action, efficacy and tolerability of these two agents in a total of 242 patients with this condition. This was an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial with 123 patients treated with levocabastine (0.5 mg/ml, two puffs per nostril twice daily) and 119 with azelastine (1 mg/ml, one puff per nostril twice daily). Onset of action was comparable for the two drugs with over 50% of patients in each group reporting significant symptomatic relief within 30 min of administration of the first dose of study medication. Therapeutic efficacy was also found to be comparable in the two groups with no statistically significant intergroup differences reported for any of the parameters evaluated, although assessments of global therapeutic efficacy revealed a trend favouring levocabastine. Levocabastine appeared to be better tolerated than azelastine (p = 0.06), with the incidence of the most common adverse experiences, application site reactions and taste disturbances, significantly higher on azelastine than with levocabastine (5% versus 1%; p = 0.05 and 5% versus 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, levocabastine nasal spray appears to be at least as effective as, but better tolerated than, azelastine nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
format Article
id doaj-art-a891a69a6da7482b917af5b56ff1969b
institution Kabale University
issn 0962-9351
1466-1861
language English
publishDate 1995-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Mediators of Inflammation
spelling doaj-art-a891a69a6da7482b917af5b56ff1969b2025-08-20T03:38:54ZengWileyMediators of Inflammation0962-93511466-18611995-01-0147S11S1510.1155/S0962935195000780Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitisRalph Mösges0Joachim Spaeth1Ludger Klimek2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Aachen, Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Aachen, Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Mayence, Mayence, GermanyLevocabastine and azelastine are currently the only antihistamines available as nasal sprays for the topical therapy of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The present study was undertaken to compare the onset of action, efficacy and tolerability of these two agents in a total of 242 patients with this condition. This was an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial with 123 patients treated with levocabastine (0.5 mg/ml, two puffs per nostril twice daily) and 119 with azelastine (1 mg/ml, one puff per nostril twice daily). Onset of action was comparable for the two drugs with over 50% of patients in each group reporting significant symptomatic relief within 30 min of administration of the first dose of study medication. Therapeutic efficacy was also found to be comparable in the two groups with no statistically significant intergroup differences reported for any of the parameters evaluated, although assessments of global therapeutic efficacy revealed a trend favouring levocabastine. Levocabastine appeared to be better tolerated than azelastine (p = 0.06), with the incidence of the most common adverse experiences, application site reactions and taste disturbances, significantly higher on azelastine than with levocabastine (5% versus 1%; p = 0.05 and 5% versus 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, levocabastine nasal spray appears to be at least as effective as, but better tolerated than, azelastine nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935195000780
spellingShingle Ralph Mösges
Joachim Spaeth
Ludger Klimek
Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
Mediators of Inflammation
title Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
title_full Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
title_fullStr Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
title_short Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
title_sort efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935195000780
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphmosges efficacyandtolerabilityoflevocabastineandazelastinenasalspraysforthetreatmentofallergicrhinitis
AT joachimspaeth efficacyandtolerabilityoflevocabastineandazelastinenasalspraysforthetreatmentofallergicrhinitis
AT ludgerklimek efficacyandtolerabilityoflevocabastineandazelastinenasalspraysforthetreatmentofallergicrhinitis