Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research

IntroductionConducting research to better understand the role of extralegal factors in courtroom decision-making requires either labor intensive methods, such as simulating a trial, or approaches that are not ecologically valid, such as using short written case vignettes. If avatars could be used in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lara A. Frumkin, Anna Stone, Mary Jane Spiller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1459044/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206738836520960
author Lara A. Frumkin
Anna Stone
Mary Jane Spiller
author_facet Lara A. Frumkin
Anna Stone
Mary Jane Spiller
author_sort Lara A. Frumkin
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionConducting research to better understand the role of extralegal factors in courtroom decision-making requires either labor intensive methods, such as simulating a trial, or approaches that are not ecologically valid, such as using short written case vignettes. If avatars could be used in simulated courtrooms, experiments could more easily manipulate extralegal variables for study without requiring significant resourcing, for example hiring actors and having access to a courtroom. The current study used previously developed stimulus materials of a human eyewitness in a courtroom and created a comparable avatar eyewitness and virtual courtroom to assess ratings of the human and avatar.MethodParticipants (N = 703) saw one of 12 videos depicting an eyewitness on the stand at a criminal trial recounting a burglary. The design was a 2 × 2 × 3, mode of presentation (human or avatar), accent (General American English or non-standard) and country of origin (Germany, Mexico or Lebanon). Three actors voiced each human and avatar pair using General American English and one of the non-standard accents (German, Mexican or Lebanese) so that variation in ratings could be attributed to presentation mode, accent and country of origin.ResultsAn analysis of covariance revealed that the avatar witnesses were rated more favorably than the humans and there were no main effects of accent nor country of origin, contrary to previous research using the human video stimuli. A three-way interaction showed the Lebanese human non-standard accented witness was rated more poorly than her standard-accented counterpart, her avatar counterpart, and the Mexican and German human non-standard accented witnesses.DiscussionFindings reveal that avatar witnesses cannot yet reliably replace their human counterparts. Discussion as to what can be done in future to further investigate how to create courtroom stimulus materials is presented along with possible explanations as to the reasons for different findings in this research than previous studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-a8016f5a46c44292ac2e82dc7e74eefb
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj-art-a8016f5a46c44292ac2e82dc7e74eefb2025-02-07T06:49:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-02-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.14590441459044Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom researchLara A. Frumkin0Anna Stone1Mary Jane Spiller2School of Psychology & Counselling, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United KingdomDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, School of Childhood and Social Care, University of East London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, School of Childhood and Social Care, University of East London, London, United KingdomIntroductionConducting research to better understand the role of extralegal factors in courtroom decision-making requires either labor intensive methods, such as simulating a trial, or approaches that are not ecologically valid, such as using short written case vignettes. If avatars could be used in simulated courtrooms, experiments could more easily manipulate extralegal variables for study without requiring significant resourcing, for example hiring actors and having access to a courtroom. The current study used previously developed stimulus materials of a human eyewitness in a courtroom and created a comparable avatar eyewitness and virtual courtroom to assess ratings of the human and avatar.MethodParticipants (N = 703) saw one of 12 videos depicting an eyewitness on the stand at a criminal trial recounting a burglary. The design was a 2 × 2 × 3, mode of presentation (human or avatar), accent (General American English or non-standard) and country of origin (Germany, Mexico or Lebanon). Three actors voiced each human and avatar pair using General American English and one of the non-standard accents (German, Mexican or Lebanese) so that variation in ratings could be attributed to presentation mode, accent and country of origin.ResultsAn analysis of covariance revealed that the avatar witnesses were rated more favorably than the humans and there were no main effects of accent nor country of origin, contrary to previous research using the human video stimuli. A three-way interaction showed the Lebanese human non-standard accented witness was rated more poorly than her standard-accented counterpart, her avatar counterpart, and the Mexican and German human non-standard accented witnesses.DiscussionFindings reveal that avatar witnesses cannot yet reliably replace their human counterparts. Discussion as to what can be done in future to further investigate how to create courtroom stimulus materials is presented along with possible explanations as to the reasons for different findings in this research than previous studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1459044/fullavatarsaccenteyewitnesscountry of origincourtrooms
spellingShingle Lara A. Frumkin
Anna Stone
Mary Jane Spiller
Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
Frontiers in Psychology
avatars
accent
eyewitness
country of origin
courtrooms
title Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
title_full Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
title_fullStr Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
title_full_unstemmed Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
title_short Avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent-related biases in mock courtroom research
title_sort avatars and humans may not elicit the same accent related biases in mock courtroom research
topic avatars
accent
eyewitness
country of origin
courtrooms
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1459044/full
work_keys_str_mv AT laraafrumkin avatarsandhumansmaynotelicitthesameaccentrelatedbiasesinmockcourtroomresearch
AT annastone avatarsandhumansmaynotelicitthesameaccentrelatedbiasesinmockcourtroomresearch
AT maryjanespiller avatarsandhumansmaynotelicitthesameaccentrelatedbiasesinmockcourtroomresearch