Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study
Objectives Women and men/partners who experience miscarriage often report poor care experiences within health services around the time of miscarriage and beyond; less is known about recurrent miscarriage (RM) care. Research is needed to explore the potential targets for improvement, in addition to i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/4/e094753.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849731950571421696 |
|---|---|
| author | Karen Matvienko-Sikar Marita Hennessy Keelin O’Donoghue Rebecca Dennehy Con Lucey Ria O’Sullivan-Lago Jennifer Uí Dhúbhgáin |
| author_facet | Karen Matvienko-Sikar Marita Hennessy Keelin O’Donoghue Rebecca Dennehy Con Lucey Ria O’Sullivan-Lago Jennifer Uí Dhúbhgáin |
| author_sort | Karen Matvienko-Sikar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives Women and men/partners who experience miscarriage often report poor care experiences within health services around the time of miscarriage and beyond; less is known about recurrent miscarriage (RM) care. Research is needed to explore the potential targets for improvement, in addition to identifying factors that support or hinder service improvement efforts and the implementation and/or sustainment of desired models of RM care. This study aimed to explore the views of knowledge users regarding RM services and supports; specifically: (a) practices and experiences and (b) facilitators and barriers to providing desired services and supports.Study design We adopted a qualitative study design underpinned by constructivism, incorporating semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.Setting Participants were recruited across the Republic of Ireland, incorporating perspectives from different geographical areas, hospital types and RM services.Participants We interviewed 13 women and 7 men/partners who had experienced ≥2 consecutive miscarriages, and 42 people involved in the delivery and/or management of RM services and supports, between June 2020 and February 2021.Results We generated three themes from the data: (1) dedicated staff; (2) dedicated space and time and (3) dedicated funding and support—prioritise RM. Our analysis supports the need for a standardised, dedicated and adequately resourced and supported service. One in which people experiencing RM are offered appropriate, individualised, timely and accessible care and support—beginning following the first miscarriage, and following a graded model. Implementation requires several multilevel actions, including prioritising RM care, adequately funding and resourcing services, enhancing health professional education and support, care coordination within and between hospitals and primary care and improving public awareness of, and addressing stigma surrounding, miscarriage.Conclusions Our analysis provides context to ‘good’ and ‘poor’ care experiences and identifies what facilitators and barriers exist to affecting change in RM care within healthcare and broader systems. In light of recent debates regarding how best to deliver RM care, and changing international guidelines, this work provides timely and important knowledge that should be harnessed to inform service improvement efforts in the Republic of Ireland and beyond. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a7b36808cc594843bf07ab27824c20ff |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-a7b36808cc594843bf07ab27824c20ff2025-08-20T03:08:22ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-04-0115410.1136/bmjopen-2024-094753Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview studyKaren Matvienko-Sikar0Marita Hennessy1Keelin O’Donoghue2Rebecca Dennehy3Con Lucey4Ria O’Sullivan-Lago5Jennifer Uí Dhúbhgáin6School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandPregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandPregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandPregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandRE:CURRENT Research Advisory Group, Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandWaterstone Clinic, Cork, IrelandRE:CURRENT Research Advisory Group, Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandObjectives Women and men/partners who experience miscarriage often report poor care experiences within health services around the time of miscarriage and beyond; less is known about recurrent miscarriage (RM) care. Research is needed to explore the potential targets for improvement, in addition to identifying factors that support or hinder service improvement efforts and the implementation and/or sustainment of desired models of RM care. This study aimed to explore the views of knowledge users regarding RM services and supports; specifically: (a) practices and experiences and (b) facilitators and barriers to providing desired services and supports.Study design We adopted a qualitative study design underpinned by constructivism, incorporating semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.Setting Participants were recruited across the Republic of Ireland, incorporating perspectives from different geographical areas, hospital types and RM services.Participants We interviewed 13 women and 7 men/partners who had experienced ≥2 consecutive miscarriages, and 42 people involved in the delivery and/or management of RM services and supports, between June 2020 and February 2021.Results We generated three themes from the data: (1) dedicated staff; (2) dedicated space and time and (3) dedicated funding and support—prioritise RM. Our analysis supports the need for a standardised, dedicated and adequately resourced and supported service. One in which people experiencing RM are offered appropriate, individualised, timely and accessible care and support—beginning following the first miscarriage, and following a graded model. Implementation requires several multilevel actions, including prioritising RM care, adequately funding and resourcing services, enhancing health professional education and support, care coordination within and between hospitals and primary care and improving public awareness of, and addressing stigma surrounding, miscarriage.Conclusions Our analysis provides context to ‘good’ and ‘poor’ care experiences and identifies what facilitators and barriers exist to affecting change in RM care within healthcare and broader systems. In light of recent debates regarding how best to deliver RM care, and changing international guidelines, this work provides timely and important knowledge that should be harnessed to inform service improvement efforts in the Republic of Ireland and beyond.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/4/e094753.full |
| spellingShingle | Karen Matvienko-Sikar Marita Hennessy Keelin O’Donoghue Rebecca Dennehy Con Lucey Ria O’Sullivan-Lago Jennifer Uí Dhúbhgáin Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study BMJ Open |
| title | Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study |
| title_full | Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study |
| title_fullStr | Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study |
| title_short | Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study |
| title_sort | views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the republic of ireland a qualitative interview study |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/4/e094753.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karenmatvienkosikar viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT maritahennessy viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT keelinodonoghue viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT rebeccadennehy viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT conlucey viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT riaosullivanlago viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT jenniferuidhubhgain viewsofknowledgeusersonrecurrentmiscarriageservicesandsupportsintherepublicofirelandaqualitativeinterviewstudy |