Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females

# Background Current literature illustrates a disparity in trunk stability push up performance (TSPU), as measured by the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM), in females throughout the lifespan when compared to their male counterparts. # Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer, Katie Whetstone, Mark Marchino, Kevin Brown, Kyle Matsel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.89667
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825139400099495936
author Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer
Katie Whetstone
Mark Marchino
Kevin Brown
Kyle Matsel
author_facet Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer
Katie Whetstone
Mark Marchino
Kevin Brown
Kyle Matsel
author_sort Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer
collection DOAJ
description # Background Current literature illustrates a disparity in trunk stability push up performance (TSPU), as measured by the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM), in females throughout the lifespan when compared to their male counterparts. # Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel exercise approach to a trunk stability (NEATS) program compared to a standard Pilates program on TSPU performance in active females aged 18-45 years. It was hypothesized that subjects in the NEATS program would have greater improvements on outcomes related to trunk stability than subjects in the Pilates program. # Study Design Randomized controlled trial # Methods All subjects were tested at baseline on Beighton criteria, the FMSTM, Y-Balance Test Upper Quarter and Lower Quarter, and grip strength by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Subjects were randomized into the NEATS (n=17) or the Pilates group (n=19). The intervention period lasted eight weeks, with exercise progression at weeks two, four, and six. # Results The main outcome was between-group pass rates on the TSPU. At posttest, 41% (n=7) of the NEATS group and 42% (n=8) of the Pilates group passed the TSPU, though there was no difference between groups (p=0.97). Significant differences were noted on the TSPU (Pilates, NEATS p=0.01) and composite scores (Pilates p=0.01; NEATS p=0.03). No within-group improvements were noted on the individual scores of the FMSTM (p=0.05-0.66). Within-group differences were noted on the posterolateral reach on the Y-Balance Test Lower Quarter (p=0.03) in the Pilates group. Between-group posttest continuous measures were not significantly different (p=0.17-0.96). # Conclusion Improvements in trunk stability were comparable between the multi-planar NEATS program and a standard Pilates program suggesting that both can be used to improve trunk stability performance in active females. # Level of Evidence 2
format Article
id doaj-art-a7a0ea68648d4b23928c46a533e8a9ce
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-a7a0ea68648d4b23928c46a533e8a9ce2025-02-11T20:30:14ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-12-01186Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active FemalesKate Schwartzkopf-PhiferKatie WhetstoneMark MarchinoKevin BrownKyle Matsel# Background Current literature illustrates a disparity in trunk stability push up performance (TSPU), as measured by the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM), in females throughout the lifespan when compared to their male counterparts. # Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel exercise approach to a trunk stability (NEATS) program compared to a standard Pilates program on TSPU performance in active females aged 18-45 years. It was hypothesized that subjects in the NEATS program would have greater improvements on outcomes related to trunk stability than subjects in the Pilates program. # Study Design Randomized controlled trial # Methods All subjects were tested at baseline on Beighton criteria, the FMSTM, Y-Balance Test Upper Quarter and Lower Quarter, and grip strength by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Subjects were randomized into the NEATS (n=17) or the Pilates group (n=19). The intervention period lasted eight weeks, with exercise progression at weeks two, four, and six. # Results The main outcome was between-group pass rates on the TSPU. At posttest, 41% (n=7) of the NEATS group and 42% (n=8) of the Pilates group passed the TSPU, though there was no difference between groups (p=0.97). Significant differences were noted on the TSPU (Pilates, NEATS p=0.01) and composite scores (Pilates p=0.01; NEATS p=0.03). No within-group improvements were noted on the individual scores of the FMSTM (p=0.05-0.66). Within-group differences were noted on the posterolateral reach on the Y-Balance Test Lower Quarter (p=0.03) in the Pilates group. Between-group posttest continuous measures were not significantly different (p=0.17-0.96). # Conclusion Improvements in trunk stability were comparable between the multi-planar NEATS program and a standard Pilates program suggesting that both can be used to improve trunk stability performance in active females. # Level of Evidence 2https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.89667
spellingShingle Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer
Katie Whetstone
Mark Marchino
Kevin Brown
Kyle Matsel
Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
title_full Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
title_fullStr Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
title_short Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females
title_sort comparison of intervention programs to improve trunk stability for active females
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.89667
work_keys_str_mv AT kateschwartzkopfphifer comparisonofinterventionprogramstoimprovetrunkstabilityforactivefemales
AT katiewhetstone comparisonofinterventionprogramstoimprovetrunkstabilityforactivefemales
AT markmarchino comparisonofinterventionprogramstoimprovetrunkstabilityforactivefemales
AT kevinbrown comparisonofinterventionprogramstoimprovetrunkstabilityforactivefemales
AT kylematsel comparisonofinterventionprogramstoimprovetrunkstabilityforactivefemales