Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence

Introduction The adverse physical consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) have been thoroughly investigated and documented. Yet, we know little about the adverse mental health consequences of the practice. To fill this research gap, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandro Galea, Salma M Abdalla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/4/e001553.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850256822463627264
author Sandro Galea
Salma M Abdalla
author_facet Sandro Galea
Salma M Abdalla
author_sort Sandro Galea
collection DOAJ
description Introduction The adverse physical consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) have been thoroughly investigated and documented. Yet, we know little about the adverse mental health consequences of the practice. To fill this research gap, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed any adverse mental health consequences related to FGM/C.Methods We searched four databases from inception to 21 December 2018. We then reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant studies. We used the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool to appraise the quality of each study and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to rate the risk of bias within studies.Results We included 16 studies in this review; only six studies examined the association between FGM/C and adverse mental health outcomes as the sole research question. Among the included studies, 10 were conducted at the participants’ country of origin. The sample size of the populations studied ranged from 3 to 4800 participants. Only one study received a rating of ‘good’ methodological quality.Fourteen of the 16 studies reported an association between FGM/C and at least adverse mental health outcome. These included eight studies that reported a higher burden of adverse mental health outcomes among women who underwent FGM compared with women who did not undergo FGM/C. Four studies reported a correlation between the severity of FGM/C and the severity of adverse mental health outcomes.Conclusion This systematic review documents an association between FGM/C and adverse mental health outcomes. Importantly, our review demonstrates the need for more rigorous research on the topic.
format Article
id doaj-art-a768e85236fb495d95be1e5fb12aaea4
institution OA Journals
issn 2059-7908
language English
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Global Health
spelling doaj-art-a768e85236fb495d95be1e5fb12aaea42025-08-20T01:56:34ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082019-07-014410.1136/bmjgh-2019-001553Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidenceSandro Galea0Salma M Abdalla1deanIndependent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response SecretariatIntroduction The adverse physical consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) have been thoroughly investigated and documented. Yet, we know little about the adverse mental health consequences of the practice. To fill this research gap, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed any adverse mental health consequences related to FGM/C.Methods We searched four databases from inception to 21 December 2018. We then reviewed all titles and abstracts for relevant studies. We used the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool to appraise the quality of each study and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to rate the risk of bias within studies.Results We included 16 studies in this review; only six studies examined the association between FGM/C and adverse mental health outcomes as the sole research question. Among the included studies, 10 were conducted at the participants’ country of origin. The sample size of the populations studied ranged from 3 to 4800 participants. Only one study received a rating of ‘good’ methodological quality.Fourteen of the 16 studies reported an association between FGM/C and at least adverse mental health outcome. These included eight studies that reported a higher burden of adverse mental health outcomes among women who underwent FGM compared with women who did not undergo FGM/C. Four studies reported a correlation between the severity of FGM/C and the severity of adverse mental health outcomes.Conclusion This systematic review documents an association between FGM/C and adverse mental health outcomes. Importantly, our review demonstrates the need for more rigorous research on the topic.https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/4/e001553.full
spellingShingle Sandro Galea
Salma M Abdalla
Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
BMJ Global Health
title Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
title_full Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
title_fullStr Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
title_short Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence
title_sort is female genital mutilation cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences a systematic review of the evidence
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/4/e001553.full
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrogalea isfemalegenitalmutilationcuttingassociatedwithadversementalhealthconsequencesasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT salmamabdalla isfemalegenitalmutilationcuttingassociatedwithadversementalhealthconsequencesasystematicreviewoftheevidence