Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification
Feature extraction is a challenging problem in radar target identification. In this paper, we propose a new approach of feature extraction by using Matrix Pencil Method in Frequency Domain (MPMFD). The proposed method takes into account not only the magnitude of the signal, but also its phase, so th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930581 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832559230952931328 |
---|---|
author | Mahmoud Khodjet-Kesba Khalil El Khamlichi Drissi Sukhan Lee Kamal Kerroum Claire Faure Christophe Pasquier |
author_facet | Mahmoud Khodjet-Kesba Khalil El Khamlichi Drissi Sukhan Lee Kamal Kerroum Claire Faure Christophe Pasquier |
author_sort | Mahmoud Khodjet-Kesba |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Feature extraction is a challenging problem in radar target identification. In this paper, we propose a new approach of feature extraction by using Matrix Pencil Method in Frequency Domain (MPMFD). The proposed method takes into account not only the magnitude of the signal, but also its phase, so that all the physical characteristics of the target will be considered. With this method, the separation between the early time and the late time is not necessary. The proposed method is compared to Matrix Pencil Method in Time Domain (MPMTD). The methods are applied on UWB backscattered signal from three canonical targets (thin wire, sphere, and cylinder). MPMFD is applied on a complex field (real and imaginary parts of the signal). To the best of our knowledge, this comparison and the reconstruction of the complex electromagnetic field by MPMFD have not been done before. We show the effect of the two extraction methods on the accuracy of three different classifiers: Naïve bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The results show that the accuracy of classification is better when using extracted features by MPMFD with SVM. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a74f9009e0ec4e99987721d2d0c1cee9 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-5869 1687-5877 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
spelling | doaj-art-a74f9009e0ec4e99987721d2d0c1cee92025-02-03T01:30:35ZengWileyInternational Journal of Antennas and Propagation1687-58691687-58772014-01-01201410.1155/2014/930581930581Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target ClassificationMahmoud Khodjet-Kesba0Khalil El Khamlichi Drissi1Sukhan Lee2Kamal Kerroum3Claire Faure4Christophe Pasquier5Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, FranceClermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, FranceISRI, 300 Cheoncheon-Dong, Jangan-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 440-746, Republic of KoreaClermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, FranceClermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, FranceClermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, FranceFeature extraction is a challenging problem in radar target identification. In this paper, we propose a new approach of feature extraction by using Matrix Pencil Method in Frequency Domain (MPMFD). The proposed method takes into account not only the magnitude of the signal, but also its phase, so that all the physical characteristics of the target will be considered. With this method, the separation between the early time and the late time is not necessary. The proposed method is compared to Matrix Pencil Method in Time Domain (MPMTD). The methods are applied on UWB backscattered signal from three canonical targets (thin wire, sphere, and cylinder). MPMFD is applied on a complex field (real and imaginary parts of the signal). To the best of our knowledge, this comparison and the reconstruction of the complex electromagnetic field by MPMFD have not been done before. We show the effect of the two extraction methods on the accuracy of three different classifiers: Naïve bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The results show that the accuracy of classification is better when using extracted features by MPMFD with SVM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930581 |
spellingShingle | Mahmoud Khodjet-Kesba Khalil El Khamlichi Drissi Sukhan Lee Kamal Kerroum Claire Faure Christophe Pasquier Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
title | Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification |
title_full | Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification |
title_short | Comparison of Matrix Pencil Extracted Features in Time Domain and in Frequency Domain for Radar Target Classification |
title_sort | comparison of matrix pencil extracted features in time domain and in frequency domain for radar target classification |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudkhodjetkesba comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification AT khalilelkhamlichidrissi comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification AT sukhanlee comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification AT kamalkerroum comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification AT clairefaure comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification AT christophepasquier comparisonofmatrixpencilextractedfeaturesintimedomainandinfrequencydomainforradartargetclassification |