PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working

Abstract Background Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly advocated for undertaking research that is useful and relevant to those impacted by it. Funding bodies now include PPI as a mandatory part of funding programmes. Although researchers may be open to PPI research, the practicalit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Marie Martin, Kayleigh Twomey, Mary Doyle-Kent, Lorraine Woods, Joanne Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Research Involvement and Engagement
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704938522804224
author Anne-Marie Martin
Kayleigh Twomey
Mary Doyle-Kent
Lorraine Woods
Joanne Murphy
author_facet Anne-Marie Martin
Kayleigh Twomey
Mary Doyle-Kent
Lorraine Woods
Joanne Murphy
author_sort Anne-Marie Martin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly advocated for undertaking research that is useful and relevant to those impacted by it. Funding bodies now include PPI as a mandatory part of funding programmes. Although researchers may be open to PPI research, the practicalities of this approach can be unclear. Therefore, we describe how we worked together to identify research priorities on a project called PPI-POWER (Patient and Public Involvement-Planning Our Work with Equity and Respect). Methods Our team comprises a person with intellectual disability, two parents of people with intellectual disability, a research officer and a researcher. We used a diary study approach to document the strategies we used to ensure everyone was heard and involved, building our partnership, successes, challenges, practicalities. We met approximately every six weeks. At the end of each meeting we talked about how we found preparing for and being part of that meeting. Results We use the PPI Ignite Network Values and Principles (2022) as a framework to present our experiences. Clear, open communication, transparency around expectations as well as flexibility, respect and understanding regarding responsibilities beyond the research were important issues that were necessary for successful working. Conclusions Careful, considerate teamworking supports the development of PPI partnerships that will be invaluable and impactful. Although our work relates to people with intellectual disability and their carers, the strategies we used can apply across different groups. Further, we make a number of recommendations that support respectful, collaborative working for those planning PPI research.
format Article
id doaj-art-a73bdfa67ecd46c29e45e91b8bb017eb
institution DOAJ
issn 2056-7529
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Research Involvement and Engagement
spelling doaj-art-a73bdfa67ecd46c29e45e91b8bb017eb2025-08-20T03:16:35ZengBMCResearch Involvement and Engagement2056-75292025-05-011111710.1186/s40900-025-00723-1PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI workingAnne-Marie Martin0Kayleigh Twomey1Mary Doyle-Kent2Lorraine Woods3Joanne Murphy4School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College CorkGraduate, University College CorkResearch Officer, Family Carers IrelandResearch Officer, Family Carers IrelandResearch Officer, Family Carers IrelandAbstract Background Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly advocated for undertaking research that is useful and relevant to those impacted by it. Funding bodies now include PPI as a mandatory part of funding programmes. Although researchers may be open to PPI research, the practicalities of this approach can be unclear. Therefore, we describe how we worked together to identify research priorities on a project called PPI-POWER (Patient and Public Involvement-Planning Our Work with Equity and Respect). Methods Our team comprises a person with intellectual disability, two parents of people with intellectual disability, a research officer and a researcher. We used a diary study approach to document the strategies we used to ensure everyone was heard and involved, building our partnership, successes, challenges, practicalities. We met approximately every six weeks. At the end of each meeting we talked about how we found preparing for and being part of that meeting. Results We use the PPI Ignite Network Values and Principles (2022) as a framework to present our experiences. Clear, open communication, transparency around expectations as well as flexibility, respect and understanding regarding responsibilities beyond the research were important issues that were necessary for successful working. Conclusions Careful, considerate teamworking supports the development of PPI partnerships that will be invaluable and impactful. Although our work relates to people with intellectual disability and their carers, the strategies we used can apply across different groups. Further, we make a number of recommendations that support respectful, collaborative working for those planning PPI research.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1Patient and public involvementResearchIntellectual disabilityFamily carers
spellingShingle Anne-Marie Martin
Kayleigh Twomey
Mary Doyle-Kent
Lorraine Woods
Joanne Murphy
PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
Research Involvement and Engagement
Patient and public involvement
Research
Intellectual disability
Family carers
title PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
title_full PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
title_fullStr PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
title_full_unstemmed PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
title_short PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working
title_sort ppi power planning our work with equity and respect a case study of ppi working
topic Patient and public involvement
Research
Intellectual disability
Family carers
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariemartin ppipowerplanningourworkwithequityandrespectacasestudyofppiworking
AT kayleightwomey ppipowerplanningourworkwithequityandrespectacasestudyofppiworking
AT marydoylekent ppipowerplanningourworkwithequityandrespectacasestudyofppiworking
AT lorrainewoods ppipowerplanningourworkwithequityandrespectacasestudyofppiworking
AT joannemurphy ppipowerplanningourworkwithequityandrespectacasestudyofppiworking