Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle

Abstract Cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) regulates cell cycle and is an emerging target for cancer therapy. There are relatively small numbers of tumor models that exhibit strong dependence on CDK2 and undergo G1 cell cycle arrest following CDK2 inhibition. The expression of P16INK4A and cyclin E1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vishnu Kumarasamy, Jianxin Wang, Michelle Roti, Yin Wan, Adam P. Dommer, Hanna Rosenheck, Sivasankar Putta, Alec Trub, John Bisi, Jay Strum, Patrick Roberts, Seth M. Rubin, Costakis Frangou, Karen McLean, Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz, Erik S. Knudsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56674-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861833298083840
author Vishnu Kumarasamy
Jianxin Wang
Michelle Roti
Yin Wan
Adam P. Dommer
Hanna Rosenheck
Sivasankar Putta
Alec Trub
John Bisi
Jay Strum
Patrick Roberts
Seth M. Rubin
Costakis Frangou
Karen McLean
Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz
Erik S. Knudsen
author_facet Vishnu Kumarasamy
Jianxin Wang
Michelle Roti
Yin Wan
Adam P. Dommer
Hanna Rosenheck
Sivasankar Putta
Alec Trub
John Bisi
Jay Strum
Patrick Roberts
Seth M. Rubin
Costakis Frangou
Karen McLean
Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz
Erik S. Knudsen
author_sort Vishnu Kumarasamy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) regulates cell cycle and is an emerging target for cancer therapy. There are relatively small numbers of tumor models that exhibit strong dependence on CDK2 and undergo G1 cell cycle arrest following CDK2 inhibition. The expression of P16INK4A and cyclin E1 determines this sensitivity to CDK2 inhibition. The co-expression of these genes occurs in breast cancer patients highlighting their clinical significance as predictive biomarkers for CDK2-targeted therapies. In cancer models that are genetically independent of CDK2, pharmacological inhibitors suppress cell proliferation by inducing 4N cell cycle arrest and increasing the expressions of phospho-CDK1 (Y15) and cyclin B1. CRISPR screens identify CDK2 loss as a mediator of resistance to a CDK2 inhibitor, INX-315. Furthermore, CDK2 deletion reverses the G2/M block induced by CDK2 inhibitors and restores cell proliferation. Complementary drug screens define multiple means to cooperate with CDK2 inhibition beyond G1/S. These include the depletion of mitotic regulators as well as CDK4/6 inhibitors cooperate with CDK2 inhibition in multiple phases of the cell cycle. Overall, this study underscores two fundamentally distinct features of response to CDK2 inhibitors that are conditioned by tumor context and could serve as the basis for differential therapeutic strategies in a wide range of cancers.
format Article
id doaj-art-a7354fd0d62842a483cf0dff9e6fb1b9
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-1723
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj-art-a7354fd0d62842a483cf0dff9e6fb1b92025-02-09T12:45:40ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232025-02-0116112110.1038/s41467-025-56674-4Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycleVishnu Kumarasamy0Jianxin Wang1Michelle Roti2Yin Wan3Adam P. Dommer4Hanna Rosenheck5Sivasankar Putta6Alec Trub7John Bisi8Jay Strum9Patrick Roberts10Seth M. Rubin11Costakis Frangou12Karen McLean13Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz14Erik S. Knudsen15Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa CruzIncyclix BioIncyclix BioIncyclix BioIncyclix BioDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa CruzDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterAbstract Cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) regulates cell cycle and is an emerging target for cancer therapy. There are relatively small numbers of tumor models that exhibit strong dependence on CDK2 and undergo G1 cell cycle arrest following CDK2 inhibition. The expression of P16INK4A and cyclin E1 determines this sensitivity to CDK2 inhibition. The co-expression of these genes occurs in breast cancer patients highlighting their clinical significance as predictive biomarkers for CDK2-targeted therapies. In cancer models that are genetically independent of CDK2, pharmacological inhibitors suppress cell proliferation by inducing 4N cell cycle arrest and increasing the expressions of phospho-CDK1 (Y15) and cyclin B1. CRISPR screens identify CDK2 loss as a mediator of resistance to a CDK2 inhibitor, INX-315. Furthermore, CDK2 deletion reverses the G2/M block induced by CDK2 inhibitors and restores cell proliferation. Complementary drug screens define multiple means to cooperate with CDK2 inhibition beyond G1/S. These include the depletion of mitotic regulators as well as CDK4/6 inhibitors cooperate with CDK2 inhibition in multiple phases of the cell cycle. Overall, this study underscores two fundamentally distinct features of response to CDK2 inhibitors that are conditioned by tumor context and could serve as the basis for differential therapeutic strategies in a wide range of cancers.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56674-4
spellingShingle Vishnu Kumarasamy
Jianxin Wang
Michelle Roti
Yin Wan
Adam P. Dommer
Hanna Rosenheck
Sivasankar Putta
Alec Trub
John Bisi
Jay Strum
Patrick Roberts
Seth M. Rubin
Costakis Frangou
Karen McLean
Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz
Erik S. Knudsen
Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
Nature Communications
title Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
title_full Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
title_fullStr Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
title_full_unstemmed Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
title_short Discrete vulnerability to pharmacological CDK2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
title_sort discrete vulnerability to pharmacological cdk2 inhibition is governed by heterogeneity of the cancer cell cycle
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56674-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vishnukumarasamy discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT jianxinwang discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT michelleroti discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT yinwan discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT adampdommer discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT hannarosenheck discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT sivasankarputta discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT alectrub discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT johnbisi discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT jaystrum discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT patrickroberts discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT sethmrubin discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT costakisfrangou discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT karenmclean discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT agnieszkakwitkiewicz discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle
AT eriksknudsen discretevulnerabilitytopharmacologicalcdk2inhibitionisgovernedbyheterogeneityofthecancercellcycle