“Non-Markovian” and “directional” errors inhibit scientific self-correction and can lead fields of study astray: an illustration using gardening and obesity-related outcomes
Abstract Herein we coin the terms non-Markovian error and biased Markovian error to describe categories of scientific errors for which general progress within a field of study may be unlikely to result in scientific self-correction. We provide examples of such errors and show their impact on studies...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Jon Agley, Sarah E. Deemer, David B. Allison |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02590-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
From novice to expert: preparing your peer review
by: Diana M. Proctor, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
A companion to the preclinical common data elements for rigor, reproducibility and transparency in basic and translational epilepsy research. A report of the TASK3‐WG1A: Pharmacology Working Group of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force
by: Brian D. Klein, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
TRANSLATION ERRORS IN UNDERGRADUATE SCIENTIFIC WRITINGS: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY
by: Roswani Siregar, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Place of Error Correction in English Language Teaching
by: Ali Akbar Khansir, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Exploring the Challenges Faced by Translator Trainees in Translating Scientific and Technical Texts between Arabic and English: An Error Analysis Approach
by: Sameer Hameed Ahmed Saeed
Published: (2024-11-01)