A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements

Until the 1960s, literature on social movements had been limited to such movements that emerged in the West in the modern period-. These movements had organizational structures and leaders and contributed to a revolution. This narrow framework contained parallelisms to the progressive theory of hist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olçum Akyüz, Mehmet Ali Akyurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University Press 2022-11-01
Series:Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3904F902A86E427880576D4EF8B37D2C
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849324171655380992
author Olçum Akyüz
Mehmet Ali Akyurt
author_facet Olçum Akyüz
Mehmet Ali Akyurt
author_sort Olçum Akyüz
collection DOAJ
description Until the 1960s, literature on social movements had been limited to such movements that emerged in the West in the modern period-. These movements had organizational structures and leaders and contributed to a revolution. This narrow framework contained parallelisms to the progressive theory of history and modernization theory. Researchers such as Antonio Gramsci, Michel de Certeau and James Scott, and approaches such as ‘history from below,’ subaltern studies and post-colonial theory played a key role in expanding and enriching views on social movements. Eric Hobsbawm’s studies on social movements in both pre-modern Europe and contemporary Latin America and Asef Bayat’s studies on contemporary Middle Eastern social movements have contributed to the expansion of the field by going beyond the boundaries of the social movements’ literature inspired by modernization theory. In this article, Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s studies on social movements are discussed comparatively, though the continuity between them is emphasized., Both their philosophical and theoretical foundations as well as their concepts and typologies are examined in the context of their contributions to the literature. Especially in Latin America and Middle East countries, where legal practices and regulations are insufficient and the existing political and bureaucratic mechanisms cannot represent the public, there are social movements that create a ‘passive revolution’ in Gramscian sense. Indeed, both Hobsbawm and Bayat studied non-Western social movements that were unorganized, leaderless, without a manifesto and non-revolutionary in the first place. Thus, by emphasizing different forms of social movement and opposition, they contributed to the critique of Eurocentric and modernist prejudices in the literature of social movements.
format Article
id doaj-art-a71cfe51bfc34f3488e5fc3e110825bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2618-6330
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences
spelling doaj-art-a71cfe51bfc34f3488e5fc3e110825bc2025-08-20T03:48:47ZengIstanbul University PressSiyasal: Journal of Political Sciences2618-63302022-11-0131240342110.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1057765123456A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social MovementsOlçum Akyüz0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3827Mehmet Ali Akyurt1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-9590Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli, Turkiyeİstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul, TürkiyeUntil the 1960s, literature on social movements had been limited to such movements that emerged in the West in the modern period-. These movements had organizational structures and leaders and contributed to a revolution. This narrow framework contained parallelisms to the progressive theory of history and modernization theory. Researchers such as Antonio Gramsci, Michel de Certeau and James Scott, and approaches such as ‘history from below,’ subaltern studies and post-colonial theory played a key role in expanding and enriching views on social movements. Eric Hobsbawm’s studies on social movements in both pre-modern Europe and contemporary Latin America and Asef Bayat’s studies on contemporary Middle Eastern social movements have contributed to the expansion of the field by going beyond the boundaries of the social movements’ literature inspired by modernization theory. In this article, Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s studies on social movements are discussed comparatively, though the continuity between them is emphasized., Both their philosophical and theoretical foundations as well as their concepts and typologies are examined in the context of their contributions to the literature. Especially in Latin America and Middle East countries, where legal practices and regulations are insufficient and the existing political and bureaucratic mechanisms cannot represent the public, there are social movements that create a ‘passive revolution’ in Gramscian sense. Indeed, both Hobsbawm and Bayat studied non-Western social movements that were unorganized, leaderless, without a manifesto and non-revolutionary in the first place. Thus, by emphasizing different forms of social movement and opposition, they contributed to the critique of Eurocentric and modernist prejudices in the literature of social movements.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3904F902A86E427880576D4EF8B37D2Ceric hobsbawmasef bayatnon-western social movementslatin americamiddle eastsubaltern studies
spellingShingle Olçum Akyüz
Mehmet Ali Akyurt
A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences
eric hobsbawm
asef bayat
non-western social movements
latin america
middle east
subaltern studies
title A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
title_full A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
title_fullStr A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
title_short A Comparison Between Hobsbawm’s and Bayat’s Views on Non-Western Social Movements
title_sort comparison between hobsbawm s and bayat s views on non western social movements
topic eric hobsbawm
asef bayat
non-western social movements
latin america
middle east
subaltern studies
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3904F902A86E427880576D4EF8B37D2C
work_keys_str_mv AT olcumakyuz acomparisonbetweenhobsbawmsandbayatsviewsonnonwesternsocialmovements
AT mehmetaliakyurt acomparisonbetweenhobsbawmsandbayatsviewsonnonwesternsocialmovements
AT olcumakyuz comparisonbetweenhobsbawmsandbayatsviewsonnonwesternsocialmovements
AT mehmetaliakyurt comparisonbetweenhobsbawmsandbayatsviewsonnonwesternsocialmovements