Ce que dire que l’on parle veut dire : réflexion sur les compétences linguistiques des derniers Ottomans
Language knowledge has often been used as a double dividing line between written and oral cultures, and between traditional skills (the three languages of the adab culture) and modernist dispositions (related with European languages, mainly French). However, a precise study of the terminology of the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-Orient
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Turkish Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/1523 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Language knowledge has often been used as a double dividing line between written and oral cultures, and between traditional skills (the three languages of the adab culture) and modernist dispositions (related with European languages, mainly French). However, a precise study of the terminology of the biographical registers set up during Abdülhamid the Second's rule (1876-1909) by the Commission of Personnel Records [sicill-i ahvâl komisyonu] reveals that this interpretative framework is flawed, partly due to the nature of self-assessment practices. Indeed, some employees did not always mention the languages they could effectively use; their colleagues who did so sometimes declared written abilities while omitting oral ones; conversely, those who sought to secure or promote their careers would claim knowledge of French even if they could not speak a single word of it. Although the Commission was aware of these problems and tried to implement normative coding procedures, this affected biographical discourses in particular ways. As a result, if one addresses the question of literacy as more related to practical capacities than cultural orientations or theoretical knowledge, one draws a collective portrait different from the individual analysis of self-evaluations and reputations: on the one hand, the cultivated modernist elites do not always display remarkable skills; on the other hand, some employees who were versed in a limited number of languages and had poor linguistic reputations had often a more sophisticated relation with literacy than what appears in the sources. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1773-0546 |