Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study
Abstract Background Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world. Methods Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Arrhythmia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70041 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850139772843982848 |
|---|---|
| author | Maiko Kuroda Michio Nagashima Masataka Narita Wataru Sasaki Naomichi Tanaka Kazuhisa Matsumoto Tsukasa Naganuma Hitoshi Mori Yoshifumi Ikeda Kengo Korai Masato Fukunaga Kenichi Hiroshima Kenji Ando Ritsushi Kato |
| author_facet | Maiko Kuroda Michio Nagashima Masataka Narita Wataru Sasaki Naomichi Tanaka Kazuhisa Matsumoto Tsukasa Naganuma Hitoshi Mori Yoshifumi Ikeda Kengo Korai Masato Fukunaga Kenichi Hiroshima Kenji Ando Ritsushi Kato |
| author_sort | Maiko Kuroda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world. Methods Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February 2006 to June 2023 were included in this study. The actual battery longevity calculated from the implantation date to the battery replacement date and the predicted battery longevity based on manufacturer reports were investigated. All patients were divided into five groups according to their initial implantation dates. After excluding the first and last groups, the data among the middle three groups (P1, P2, P3) were compared. Results A total of 3119 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 2138; ICDs, 477; cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers [CRTPs], 121; cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators [CRTDs], 383) were enrolled in this study. The predicted device longevity improved over time for all devices, but in recent analyses, it has been overestimated compared to the actual device longevity for PMs, ICDs, and CRTPs. The actual device longevity of PMs, ICDs, and CRTDs exhibited an extension in the early two periods (P1 vs. P2), but no extension was observed in the most recent two periods (P2 vs. P3). CRTPs showed no improvement in any of the periods. Conclusion The battery longevity has improved by only about 1 year over the past nearly 15 years. Moreover, the discrepancy between the predicted and actual battery longevity suggests that a reevaluation of the methods for calculating the predicted battery longevity may be necessary. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a6de1fb590e548658bcc1aa7f398ae5d |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1880-4276 1883-2148 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Arrhythmia |
| spelling | doaj-art-a6de1fb590e548658bcc1aa7f398ae5d2025-08-20T02:30:08ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482025-04-01412n/an/a10.1002/joa3.70041Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY studyMaiko Kuroda0Michio Nagashima1Masataka Narita2Wataru Sasaki3Naomichi Tanaka4Kazuhisa Matsumoto5Tsukasa Naganuma6Hitoshi Mori7Yoshifumi Ikeda8Kengo Korai9Masato Fukunaga10Kenichi Hiroshima11Kenji Ando12Ritsushi Kato13Department of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center Saitama Medical University Hidaka JapanAbstract Background Technological development has improved the battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there have been no reports on the extent of the improvement in battery longevity in the real world. Methods Patients who underwent CIED exchanges from February 2006 to June 2023 were included in this study. The actual battery longevity calculated from the implantation date to the battery replacement date and the predicted battery longevity based on manufacturer reports were investigated. All patients were divided into five groups according to their initial implantation dates. After excluding the first and last groups, the data among the middle three groups (P1, P2, P3) were compared. Results A total of 3119 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 2138; ICDs, 477; cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers [CRTPs], 121; cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators [CRTDs], 383) were enrolled in this study. The predicted device longevity improved over time for all devices, but in recent analyses, it has been overestimated compared to the actual device longevity for PMs, ICDs, and CRTPs. The actual device longevity of PMs, ICDs, and CRTDs exhibited an extension in the early two periods (P1 vs. P2), but no extension was observed in the most recent two periods (P2 vs. P3). CRTPs showed no improvement in any of the periods. Conclusion The battery longevity has improved by only about 1 year over the past nearly 15 years. Moreover, the discrepancy between the predicted and actual battery longevity suggests that a reevaluation of the methods for calculating the predicted battery longevity may be necessary.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70041battery longevityCRTDCRTPimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorpacemaker |
| spellingShingle | Maiko Kuroda Michio Nagashima Masataka Narita Wataru Sasaki Naomichi Tanaka Kazuhisa Matsumoto Tsukasa Naganuma Hitoshi Mori Yoshifumi Ikeda Kengo Korai Masato Fukunaga Kenichi Hiroshima Kenji Ando Ritsushi Kato Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study Journal of Arrhythmia battery longevity CRTD CRTP implantable cardioverter defibrillator pacemaker |
| title | Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study |
| title_full | Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study |
| title_fullStr | Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study |
| title_short | Advancements in BATTERY longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real‐world data: BATTERY study |
| title_sort | advancements in battery longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices from real world data battery study |
| topic | battery longevity CRTD CRTP implantable cardioverter defibrillator pacemaker |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70041 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maikokuroda advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT michionagashima advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT masatakanarita advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT watarusasaki advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT naomichitanaka advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT kazuhisamatsumoto advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT tsukasanaganuma advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT hitoshimori advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT yoshifumiikeda advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT kengokorai advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT masatofukunaga advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT kenichihiroshima advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT kenjiando advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy AT ritsushikato advancementsinbatterylongevityofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesfromrealworlddatabatterystudy |