Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval
Estimating building heights is essential for urban planning, disaster assessment, and sustainable development. While the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was primarily designed for forest measurements, it also holds potential for large-scale building...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | GIScience & Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2025.2498785 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850282008672993280 |
|---|---|
| author | Peimin Chen Huabing Huang Peng Qin Zhenbang Wu Zixuan Wang Chong Liu Na Dong Jie Wang |
| author_facet | Peimin Chen Huabing Huang Peng Qin Zhenbang Wu Zixuan Wang Chong Liu Na Dong Jie Wang |
| author_sort | Peimin Chen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Estimating building heights is essential for urban planning, disaster assessment, and sustainable development. While the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was primarily designed for forest measurements, it also holds potential for large-scale building height retrieval. This study evaluates the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A version 2 (V2) data for building height retrieval by comparing it with the airborne LiDAR-derived normalized digital surface model (nDSM). To ensure data reliability, we refined the GEDI dataset by excluding footprints outside buildings, filtering out low-quality footprints, removing footprints failing to detect ground elevation using the interquartile range (IQR) detection method, and excluding footprints with geolocation errors through an eight-direction offset approach. We assessed the effectiveness of different relative height (RH) metrics and systematically analyzed key influential factors in building height retrieval. Results indicate that GEDI RH96 achieves the highest correlation with reference building heights (R2 = 0.82, MAE = 1.67 m, RMSE = 4.40 m, rRMSE = 34.46%). GEDI demonstrates the highest accuracy for mid- and high-rise buildings, whereas low-rise buildings (<5 m) exhibit lower accuracy and tend to be overestimated (RMSE = 2.17 m, rRMSE = 49.79%). Sensitivity and slope are the most significant factors influencing the accuracy of building height retrieval. GEDI data with sensitivity above 0.95 showed a 4.66% decrease in rRMSE compared to data with sensitivity above 0.90. Slope negatively affects building height retrieval accuracy. Building roof type has a moderate impact; flat-roof buildings exhibit a slight advantage over pitched- and curved-roof buildings, with rRMSE reductions of 1.86% and 4.74%, respectively. Neither GEDI beam type nor data acquisition time significantly affect the accuracy of height retrieval. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for optimizing GEDI data in building height retrieval, contributing to large-scale building height mapping. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a692e7dd8c1d4a00af91c0943c8da7c8 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1548-1603 1943-7226 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | GIScience & Remote Sensing |
| spelling | doaj-art-a692e7dd8c1d4a00af91c0943c8da7c82025-08-20T01:48:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGIScience & Remote Sensing1548-16031943-72262025-12-0162110.1080/15481603.2025.2498785Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrievalPeimin Chen0Huabing Huang1Peng Qin2Zhenbang Wu3Zixuan Wang4Chong Liu5Na Dong6Jie Wang7School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaPengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, ChinaEstimating building heights is essential for urban planning, disaster assessment, and sustainable development. While the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was primarily designed for forest measurements, it also holds potential for large-scale building height retrieval. This study evaluates the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A version 2 (V2) data for building height retrieval by comparing it with the airborne LiDAR-derived normalized digital surface model (nDSM). To ensure data reliability, we refined the GEDI dataset by excluding footprints outside buildings, filtering out low-quality footprints, removing footprints failing to detect ground elevation using the interquartile range (IQR) detection method, and excluding footprints with geolocation errors through an eight-direction offset approach. We assessed the effectiveness of different relative height (RH) metrics and systematically analyzed key influential factors in building height retrieval. Results indicate that GEDI RH96 achieves the highest correlation with reference building heights (R2 = 0.82, MAE = 1.67 m, RMSE = 4.40 m, rRMSE = 34.46%). GEDI demonstrates the highest accuracy for mid- and high-rise buildings, whereas low-rise buildings (<5 m) exhibit lower accuracy and tend to be overestimated (RMSE = 2.17 m, rRMSE = 49.79%). Sensitivity and slope are the most significant factors influencing the accuracy of building height retrieval. GEDI data with sensitivity above 0.95 showed a 4.66% decrease in rRMSE compared to data with sensitivity above 0.90. Slope negatively affects building height retrieval accuracy. Building roof type has a moderate impact; flat-roof buildings exhibit a slight advantage over pitched- and curved-roof buildings, with rRMSE reductions of 1.86% and 4.74%, respectively. Neither GEDI beam type nor data acquisition time significantly affect the accuracy of height retrieval. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for optimizing GEDI data in building height retrieval, contributing to large-scale building height mapping.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2025.2498785GEDI L2Abuilding height retrievalaccuracy assessmentinfluential factors |
| spellingShingle | Peimin Chen Huabing Huang Peng Qin Zhenbang Wu Zixuan Wang Chong Liu Na Dong Jie Wang Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval GIScience & Remote Sensing GEDI L2A building height retrieval accuracy assessment influential factors |
| title | Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval |
| title_full | Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval |
| title_fullStr | Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval |
| title_short | Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval |
| title_sort | unveiling the performance and influential factors of gedi l2a for building height retrieval |
| topic | GEDI L2A building height retrieval accuracy assessment influential factors |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2025.2498785 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peiminchen unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT huabinghuang unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT pengqin unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT zhenbangwu unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT zixuanwang unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT chongliu unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT nadong unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval AT jiewang unveilingtheperformanceandinfluentialfactorsofgedil2aforbuildingheightretrieval |