Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy

Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-established predictor of recurrence and metastasis in colorectal malignancy. However, the independent effect of vascular invasion (VI) alone, without lymphatic involvement, remains unclear. Additionally, the phenomenon of stage migration, where und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Waheeb Al-Kubati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:World Journal of Colorectal Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/wjcs/fulltext/2025/04000/vascular_invasion_without_lymphatic_dissemination.2.aspx
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849684641808646144
author Waheeb Al-Kubati
author_facet Waheeb Al-Kubati
author_sort Waheeb Al-Kubati
collection DOAJ
description Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-established predictor of recurrence and metastasis in colorectal malignancy. However, the independent effect of vascular invasion (VI) alone, without lymphatic involvement, remains unclear. Additionally, the phenomenon of stage migration, where undetected nodal or systemic involvement alters prognosis, has not been systematically considered in prior analyses. Objectives: This study investigates the prognostic role of VI in colorectal cancer (CRC) while accounting for stage migration to analyze the association of VI with recurrence and distant metastasis compared to cases with both VI and lymphatic invasion (VI+LI). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Patient and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 60 consecutive CRC patients who underwent curative resection between 2018 and 2024. The patients were categorized into VI-alone (n = 24, 40%) and VI+LI (n = 36, 60%). Stage migration was analyzed by tracking disease progression over time to assess its effect on survival trends. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcomes included recurrence rates and distant metastasis, and the survival analysis was adjusted for stage migration to ensure that the prognosis assessment was accurate. Sample Size: The sample comprised 60 patients, of whom 24 presented VI without lymphatic dissemination and 39 presented both VI and LI. (Sixty patients; VI alone: 24, VI+LI: 36). Results: After adjusting for stage migration, the VI-alone patients exhibited a higher recurrence rate (50%) than that of the VI+LI patients (25%, P < .001). The occurrence of distant metastasis was significantly higher in the VI-alone patients (25%) compared to that in the VI+LI patients (2.8%, P < .001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis initially suggested better recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the VI+LI Stage I-II patients (75%) than in the VI-alone patients (45.8%, P < .05). However, after adjusting for stage migration, this difference artificially inflated because delayed lymph node detection shifted patients from Stage I-II to Stage III. Logistic regression highlighted VI-alone as an independent predictor of recurrence (Odds ratio (OR) 174 = 0.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.06–0.87, P = .027) and metastasis (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–0.90, P = 175.013). Conclusion: VI is a critical independent predictor of recurrence and metastasis in CRC, even without lymphatic involvement. Stage migration significantly influenced the survival trends, explaining the paradoxical improvement in early-stage VI+LI patients. These findings emphasize the need for closer monitoring and refined staging approaches to prevent the underestimation of recurrence risk in patients with VI. Limitations: This study is limited by its retrospective design, single-center setting, and relatively small sample size. Larger prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings. Conflict of Interest: None.
format Article
id doaj-art-a681caa3f90a486e832f45923a7df76d
institution DOAJ
issn 1941-8213
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series World Journal of Colorectal Surgery
spelling doaj-art-a681caa3f90a486e832f45923a7df76d2025-08-20T03:23:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsWorld Journal of Colorectal Surgery1941-82132025-04-01142404710.4103/wjcs.wjcs_3_25Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal MalignancyWaheeb Al-KubatiBackground: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-established predictor of recurrence and metastasis in colorectal malignancy. However, the independent effect of vascular invasion (VI) alone, without lymphatic involvement, remains unclear. Additionally, the phenomenon of stage migration, where undetected nodal or systemic involvement alters prognosis, has not been systematically considered in prior analyses. Objectives: This study investigates the prognostic role of VI in colorectal cancer (CRC) while accounting for stage migration to analyze the association of VI with recurrence and distant metastasis compared to cases with both VI and lymphatic invasion (VI+LI). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Patient and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 60 consecutive CRC patients who underwent curative resection between 2018 and 2024. The patients were categorized into VI-alone (n = 24, 40%) and VI+LI (n = 36, 60%). Stage migration was analyzed by tracking disease progression over time to assess its effect on survival trends. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcomes included recurrence rates and distant metastasis, and the survival analysis was adjusted for stage migration to ensure that the prognosis assessment was accurate. Sample Size: The sample comprised 60 patients, of whom 24 presented VI without lymphatic dissemination and 39 presented both VI and LI. (Sixty patients; VI alone: 24, VI+LI: 36). Results: After adjusting for stage migration, the VI-alone patients exhibited a higher recurrence rate (50%) than that of the VI+LI patients (25%, P < .001). The occurrence of distant metastasis was significantly higher in the VI-alone patients (25%) compared to that in the VI+LI patients (2.8%, P < .001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis initially suggested better recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the VI+LI Stage I-II patients (75%) than in the VI-alone patients (45.8%, P < .05). However, after adjusting for stage migration, this difference artificially inflated because delayed lymph node detection shifted patients from Stage I-II to Stage III. Logistic regression highlighted VI-alone as an independent predictor of recurrence (Odds ratio (OR) 174 = 0.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.06–0.87, P = .027) and metastasis (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–0.90, P = 175.013). Conclusion: VI is a critical independent predictor of recurrence and metastasis in CRC, even without lymphatic involvement. Stage migration significantly influenced the survival trends, explaining the paradoxical improvement in early-stage VI+LI patients. These findings emphasize the need for closer monitoring and refined staging approaches to prevent the underestimation of recurrence risk in patients with VI. Limitations: This study is limited by its retrospective design, single-center setting, and relatively small sample size. Larger prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings. Conflict of Interest: None.https://journals.lww.com/wjcs/fulltext/2025/04000/vascular_invasion_without_lymphatic_dissemination.2.aspxcolorectal cancerdistant metastasislymphatic invasionrecurrencevascular invasion
spellingShingle Waheeb Al-Kubati
Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
World Journal of Colorectal Surgery
colorectal cancer
distant metastasis
lymphatic invasion
recurrence
vascular invasion
title Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
title_full Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
title_fullStr Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
title_short Vascular Invasion without Lymphatic Dissemination is an Independent Predictive Indicator of Relapse and Remote Metastasis in Colorectal Malignancy
title_sort vascular invasion without lymphatic dissemination is an independent predictive indicator of relapse and remote metastasis in colorectal malignancy
topic colorectal cancer
distant metastasis
lymphatic invasion
recurrence
vascular invasion
url https://journals.lww.com/wjcs/fulltext/2025/04000/vascular_invasion_without_lymphatic_dissemination.2.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT waheebalkubati vascularinvasionwithoutlymphaticdisseminationisanindependentpredictiveindicatorofrelapseandremotemetastasisincolorectalmalignancy