Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations
P rohibition of taking wage for duties obligations as a juridical rule has been agreed upon by Jurisprudents. Nevertheless, most jurisprudents have discussed the permissibility of taking wage for duties obligations by dividing them into two parts: disciplinary obligations and non-disciplinary on...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
2011-12-01
|
| Series: | آموزههای فقه مدني |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_899_dcbc9b6752579b704982a9fcc1763384.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850074776678170624 |
|---|---|
| author | Muhammad Taqi Fakhlai M. Raza Sheikhi |
| author_facet | Muhammad Taqi Fakhlai M. Raza Sheikhi |
| author_sort | Muhammad Taqi Fakhlai |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | P
rohibition of taking wage for duties obligations as a juridical rule has been agreed upon by Jurisprudents. Nevertheless, most jurisprudents have discussed the permissibility of taking wage for duties obligations by dividing them into two parts: disciplinary obligations and non-disciplinary one. Since the reasons advanced for this rule in later juridical books include some rational arguments, the problem of non-
have been imposed upon him. In other aspect, there is dispute among Shiite jurisprudents about the concept of this title. Juridical arguments denote that the meaning of this title is a person who is enemy of Ahlol-Bayt and regards this enmity as a part of his religion. The most of jurisprudents believe that nasebi is a person who is the enemy of Ahlol-Bayt and makes it clear in a way. In contrary, some wanted to
exceptionality of rational decree has been posed against permission of taking wage for obligations. Given to this problem, later jurisprudents have attempted to find solution for it in different ways. This article has analyzed and criticized sixteen solutions that have been posed in this regard and at last it has regarded one of the solutions that have been provided by Imam Khomeini as the best one. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a651f949deb847aeb9aac5d4ab75c80e |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2251-936X 2783-3690 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
| publisher | Razavi University of Islamic Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | آموزههای فقه مدني |
| spelling | doaj-art-a651f949deb847aeb9aac5d4ab75c80e2025-08-20T02:46:29ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزههای فقه مدني2251-936X2783-36902011-12-01342548899Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties ObligationsMuhammad Taqi Fakhlai0M. Raza Sheikhi1(Associate professor of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)(An A.M of jurisprudence and the foundation of Islamic law)P rohibition of taking wage for duties obligations as a juridical rule has been agreed upon by Jurisprudents. Nevertheless, most jurisprudents have discussed the permissibility of taking wage for duties obligations by dividing them into two parts: disciplinary obligations and non-disciplinary one. Since the reasons advanced for this rule in later juridical books include some rational arguments, the problem of non- have been imposed upon him. In other aspect, there is dispute among Shiite jurisprudents about the concept of this title. Juridical arguments denote that the meaning of this title is a person who is enemy of Ahlol-Bayt and regards this enmity as a part of his religion. The most of jurisprudents believe that nasebi is a person who is the enemy of Ahlol-Bayt and makes it clear in a way. In contrary, some wanted to exceptionality of rational decree has been posed against permission of taking wage for obligations. Given to this problem, later jurisprudents have attempted to find solution for it in different ways. This article has analyzed and criticized sixteen solutions that have been posed in this regard and at last it has regarded one of the solutions that have been provided by Imam Khomeini as the best one.https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_899_dcbc9b6752579b704982a9fcc1763384.pdf key words: prohibition of taking wageritual obligationsregularizing obligations |
| spellingShingle | Muhammad Taqi Fakhlai M. Raza Sheikhi Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations آموزههای فقه مدني key words: prohibition of taking wage ritual obligations regularizing obligations |
| title | Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations |
| title_full | Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations |
| title_fullStr | Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations |
| title_short | Investigating Juridical Views about Solving the Problem of None-Particularization of the Rule of Prohibition of Taking Wage for Duties Obligations |
| title_sort | investigating juridical views about solving the problem of none particularization of the rule of prohibition of taking wage for duties obligations |
| topic | key words: prohibition of taking wage ritual obligations regularizing obligations |
| url | https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_899_dcbc9b6752579b704982a9fcc1763384.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadtaqifakhlai investigatingjuridicalviewsaboutsolvingtheproblemofnoneparticularizationoftheruleofprohibitionoftakingwagefordutiesobligations AT mrazasheikhi investigatingjuridicalviewsaboutsolvingtheproblemofnoneparticularizationoftheruleofprohibitionoftakingwagefordutiesobligations |