Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain
OBJECTIVE: Research has demonstrated the utility of the Pain Behavior Measurement (PBM) system as a pain index. PBM involves the recording of sighing, rubbing, grimacing, guarding and bracing. A modification of this system has been proposed, focusing on the occurrence of joint flexing, rubbing, unlo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2003-01-01
|
Series: | Pain Research and Management |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/434267 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832561516461686784 |
---|---|
author | Shannon Fuchs-Lacelle Thomas Hadjistavropoulos Donald Sharpe Jaime Williams Ronald Martin Diane LaChapelle |
author_facet | Shannon Fuchs-Lacelle Thomas Hadjistavropoulos Donald Sharpe Jaime Williams Ronald Martin Diane LaChapelle |
author_sort | Shannon Fuchs-Lacelle |
collection | DOAJ |
description | OBJECTIVE: Research has demonstrated the utility of the Pain Behavior Measurement (PBM) system as a pain index. PBM involves the recording of sighing, rubbing, grimacing, guarding and bracing. A modification of this system has been proposed, focusing on the occurrence of joint flexing, rubbing, unloading the joint, guarding and rigidity, specifically for patients with knee pain. The aim of the present study was to compare the original PBM to the modified version in a sample of knee replacement patients to assess the utility of the more specialized approach. It was expected that the more discomforting physiotherapy activities (knee bending and quadriceps exercises) would result in more pain behaviours than intermediate activities (walking and standing), which, in turn, would result in more pain behaviours than reclining. The extent to which each system reflected this expected pattern was examined. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a610af225e354ebdb5404fb0356e8fda |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1203-6765 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Pain Research and Management |
spelling | doaj-art-a610af225e354ebdb5404fb0356e8fda2025-02-03T01:24:53ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67652003-01-018420521110.1155/2003/434267Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee PainShannon Fuchs-Lacelle0Thomas Hadjistavropoulos1Donald Sharpe2Jaime Williams3Ronald Martin4Diane LaChapelle5University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan;, CanadaUniversity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan;, CanadaUniversity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan;, CanadaUniversity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan;, CanadaUniversity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan;, CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaOBJECTIVE: Research has demonstrated the utility of the Pain Behavior Measurement (PBM) system as a pain index. PBM involves the recording of sighing, rubbing, grimacing, guarding and bracing. A modification of this system has been proposed, focusing on the occurrence of joint flexing, rubbing, unloading the joint, guarding and rigidity, specifically for patients with knee pain. The aim of the present study was to compare the original PBM to the modified version in a sample of knee replacement patients to assess the utility of the more specialized approach. It was expected that the more discomforting physiotherapy activities (knee bending and quadriceps exercises) would result in more pain behaviours than intermediate activities (walking and standing), which, in turn, would result in more pain behaviours than reclining. The extent to which each system reflected this expected pattern was examined.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/434267 |
spellingShingle | Shannon Fuchs-Lacelle Thomas Hadjistavropoulos Donald Sharpe Jaime Williams Ronald Martin Diane LaChapelle Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain Pain Research and Management |
title | Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain |
title_full | Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain |
title_fullStr | Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain |
title_short | Comparing Two Observational Systems in the Assessment of Knee Pain |
title_sort | comparing two observational systems in the assessment of knee pain |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/434267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shannonfuchslacelle comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain AT thomashadjistavropoulos comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain AT donaldsharpe comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain AT jaimewilliams comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain AT ronaldmartin comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain AT dianelachapelle comparingtwoobservationalsystemsintheassessmentofkneepain |