Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”

Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, social and economic cost. The incidence of these fractures is expected to increase with an ever-growing elderly world-population. The complex nature and varied pattern of these injuries requires a rang...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roland Bell, Mohammed Remtulla, Bryan Riemer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Trauma Case Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000172
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850223123875495936
author Roland Bell
Mohammed Remtulla
Bryan Riemer
author_facet Roland Bell
Mohammed Remtulla
Bryan Riemer
author_sort Roland Bell
collection DOAJ
description Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, social and economic cost. The incidence of these fractures is expected to increase with an ever-growing elderly world-population. The complex nature and varied pattern of these injuries requires a range of specialized surgical techniques and tools. Fixation alone is being increasingly regarded as the preferred method of addressing these fractures, even in cases where the femoral stem is unstable, showing favourable outcomes overall when compared to a fix-and-replace approach. Lateral plate fixation is the primary surgical method for either case, and while there is a growing offer of implants specifically for this subset of orthopaedic injuries, the problem of non-union appears to be the most common of complications encountered postoperatively. We prefer fixation alone, including for Unified Classification System (UCS) B2 and B3 type fractures. A small-fragment plate fixed at the fracture apex acts as both a reduction device, thereby simplifying the operation itself, and as a buttressing device. The lateral tension-banding plate method can exploit the latter function of this smaller plate to improve the stability of the fixed construct, and thereby encourage more reliable bone healing. Cases: We have treated 6 patients between the ages of 59 and 93 with UCS B1, B2, C and D fractures in this fashion. Fragments around an unstable stem (as with a UCS B2 or B3 fracture) were first reduced anatomically and fixed using cerclages, effectively creating a UCS B1, C or D type fracture, which can then be addressed using this two-plating system. All patients were discharged from hospital, returning home to activities of daily living. All radiographic follow-up demonstrated maintenance of reduction and implant position. For patients with radiographic follow-up beyond two months, fracture consolidation or partial consolidation was noted. No surgical infections were recorded. Conclusions: We present this method of fixation for these types of fractures as a “mixed principles” approach to osteosynthesis. Here, the buttressing nature of the medial femoral cortex is at least in part reconstituted so that compressive forces are generated across cortices where an oblique or spiral fracture pattern would otherwise generate shear forces. Re-establishing these biomechanics with a lateral tension band plate, we assume, generates a more stable construct that favours bone healing and reduces the chances of non- or mal- union.
format Article
id doaj-art-a5a6bfb5d2384e1fae5e5e306db0aaeb
institution OA Journals
issn 2352-6440
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Trauma Case Reports
spelling doaj-art-a5a6bfb5d2384e1fae5e5e306db0aaeb2025-08-20T02:06:04ZengElsevierTrauma Case Reports2352-64402025-04-015610114010.1016/j.tcr.2025.101140Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”Roland Bell0Mohammed Remtulla1Bryan Riemer2Corresponding author.; Dept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, United KingdomDept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, United KingdomDept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, United KingdomBackground: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, social and economic cost. The incidence of these fractures is expected to increase with an ever-growing elderly world-population. The complex nature and varied pattern of these injuries requires a range of specialized surgical techniques and tools. Fixation alone is being increasingly regarded as the preferred method of addressing these fractures, even in cases where the femoral stem is unstable, showing favourable outcomes overall when compared to a fix-and-replace approach. Lateral plate fixation is the primary surgical method for either case, and while there is a growing offer of implants specifically for this subset of orthopaedic injuries, the problem of non-union appears to be the most common of complications encountered postoperatively. We prefer fixation alone, including for Unified Classification System (UCS) B2 and B3 type fractures. A small-fragment plate fixed at the fracture apex acts as both a reduction device, thereby simplifying the operation itself, and as a buttressing device. The lateral tension-banding plate method can exploit the latter function of this smaller plate to improve the stability of the fixed construct, and thereby encourage more reliable bone healing. Cases: We have treated 6 patients between the ages of 59 and 93 with UCS B1, B2, C and D fractures in this fashion. Fragments around an unstable stem (as with a UCS B2 or B3 fracture) were first reduced anatomically and fixed using cerclages, effectively creating a UCS B1, C or D type fracture, which can then be addressed using this two-plating system. All patients were discharged from hospital, returning home to activities of daily living. All radiographic follow-up demonstrated maintenance of reduction and implant position. For patients with radiographic follow-up beyond two months, fracture consolidation or partial consolidation was noted. No surgical infections were recorded. Conclusions: We present this method of fixation for these types of fractures as a “mixed principles” approach to osteosynthesis. Here, the buttressing nature of the medial femoral cortex is at least in part reconstituted so that compressive forces are generated across cortices where an oblique or spiral fracture pattern would otherwise generate shear forces. Re-establishing these biomechanics with a lateral tension band plate, we assume, generates a more stable construct that favours bone healing and reduces the chances of non- or mal- union.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000172Periprosthetic fracturesJoint revisionHip replacementBiomechanicsFracture osteosynthesis
spellingShingle Roland Bell
Mohammed Remtulla
Bryan Riemer
Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
Trauma Case Reports
Periprosthetic fractures
Joint revision
Hip replacement
Biomechanics
Fracture osteosynthesis
title Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
title_full Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
title_fullStr Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
title_full_unstemmed Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
title_short Open reduction, internal fixation of Vancouver B1, C & D type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex - The “Apex Plate”
title_sort open reduction internal fixation of vancouver b1 c amp d type periprosthetic femoral fractures with use of an antiglide plate at fracture apex the apex plate
topic Periprosthetic fractures
Joint revision
Hip replacement
Biomechanics
Fracture osteosynthesis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000172
work_keys_str_mv AT rolandbell openreductioninternalfixationofvancouverb1campdtypeperiprostheticfemoralfractureswithuseofanantiglideplateatfractureapextheapexplate
AT mohammedremtulla openreductioninternalfixationofvancouverb1campdtypeperiprostheticfemoralfractureswithuseofanantiglideplateatfractureapextheapexplate
AT bryanriemer openreductioninternalfixationofvancouverb1campdtypeperiprostheticfemoralfractureswithuseofanantiglideplateatfractureapextheapexplate