Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution

Abstract Individual grazing patterns among cattle can contribute to sustainability of land use, however, little is known about the consistency of these grazing patterns. To address this knowledge gap, fifty Angus x Hereford cows were observed in repeated assays: A management assay (handling procedur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maggie Creamer, Kristina Horback
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84090-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559758050426880
author Maggie Creamer
Kristina Horback
author_facet Maggie Creamer
Kristina Horback
author_sort Maggie Creamer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Individual grazing patterns among cattle can contribute to sustainability of land use, however, little is known about the consistency of these grazing patterns. To address this knowledge gap, fifty Angus x Hereford cows were observed in repeated assays: A management assay (handling procedure, narrow chute, hydraulic squeeze), a social-feed trade-off assay (SFTA; choice between social mates and feed item), and novel approach assay (choice between social mates and feed item with novel pattern). The same cattle were tracked with GPS collars over two grazing seasons (June-August 2021 and 2022) and average grazing-related metrics (e.g., elevation used, distance traveled) were calculated within each season. Cows with a more passive response in the chute were found at higher elevation (p = 0.017), further from water (p = 0.043), and closer to supplement sites (p = 0.029). Cows that had higher latency to supplement in the SFTA traveled shorter distances on rangeland (p = 0.035). Thus, there was some evidence that cows with a more passive response to isolation and management had more optimal grazing patterns (grazed underutilized areas of the range at higher elevations and further from water sources). Selecting cattle with more optimal foraging patterns based on observable behaviors during handling and isolation could improve the sustainability of rangeland grazing.
format Article
id doaj-art-a58afd7dd74b477793563a22816e8d87
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-a58afd7dd74b477793563a22816e8d872025-01-05T12:14:39ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111410.1038/s41598-024-84090-zCows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distributionMaggie Creamer0Kristina Horback1Department of Animal Science, University of California, DavisDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, DavisAbstract Individual grazing patterns among cattle can contribute to sustainability of land use, however, little is known about the consistency of these grazing patterns. To address this knowledge gap, fifty Angus x Hereford cows were observed in repeated assays: A management assay (handling procedure, narrow chute, hydraulic squeeze), a social-feed trade-off assay (SFTA; choice between social mates and feed item), and novel approach assay (choice between social mates and feed item with novel pattern). The same cattle were tracked with GPS collars over two grazing seasons (June-August 2021 and 2022) and average grazing-related metrics (e.g., elevation used, distance traveled) were calculated within each season. Cows with a more passive response in the chute were found at higher elevation (p = 0.017), further from water (p = 0.043), and closer to supplement sites (p = 0.029). Cows that had higher latency to supplement in the SFTA traveled shorter distances on rangeland (p = 0.035). Thus, there was some evidence that cows with a more passive response to isolation and management had more optimal grazing patterns (grazed underutilized areas of the range at higher elevations and further from water sources). Selecting cattle with more optimal foraging patterns based on observable behaviors during handling and isolation could improve the sustainability of rangeland grazing.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84090-zCattleBehaviorGPS-tracking collarsRangelandSustainabilityConsistent individual differences
spellingShingle Maggie Creamer
Kristina Horback
Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
Scientific Reports
Cattle
Behavior
GPS-tracking collars
Rangeland
Sustainability
Consistent individual differences
title Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
title_full Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
title_fullStr Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
title_full_unstemmed Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
title_short Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
title_sort cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution
topic Cattle
Behavior
GPS-tracking collars
Rangeland
Sustainability
Consistent individual differences
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84090-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maggiecreamer cowsthatarelessactiveinthechutehavemoreoptimalgrazingdistribution
AT kristinahorback cowsthatarelessactiveinthechutehavemoreoptimalgrazingdistribution