Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports

ABSTRACT Earthworms originating from Europe (e.g., Lumbricus spp., Aporrectodea spp.), which are common in the United States and southern Canada can create hazardous conditions at airports by attracting birds that pose a threat to aircraft. These nonnative earthworms are also considered pests on gol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas W. Seamans, Bradley F. Blackwell, Glen E. Bernhardt, Daniel A. Potter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-06-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.545
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850116192497303552
author Thomas W. Seamans
Bradley F. Blackwell
Glen E. Bernhardt
Daniel A. Potter
author_facet Thomas W. Seamans
Bradley F. Blackwell
Glen E. Bernhardt
Daniel A. Potter
author_sort Thomas W. Seamans
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Earthworms originating from Europe (e.g., Lumbricus spp., Aporrectodea spp.), which are common in the United States and southern Canada can create hazardous conditions at airports by attracting birds that pose a threat to aircraft. These nonnative earthworms are also considered pests on golf courses and sports fields, as well as having detrimental effects on temperate boreal forests. No toxicants or repellents are currently registered for earthworm control in the United States. Our purpose was to identify products that could be used to repel or suppress nonnative earthworms on airports or other managed sites where they pose a hazard or nuisance. We conducted experiments on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Plum Brook Station, Ohio, USA, and at an area about 15 km south of this site, during 2007–2013. We hypothesized that either abrasiveness or extreme low or high pH levels would be characteristic of an efficacious repellent. Ammonium sulfate fertilizer (an acidic treatment) repelled Lumbricus terrestris in choice tests. However, 6 applications of ammonium sulfate over 2 years only reduced the field density of Aporrectodea spp., and not Lumbricus spp. Application of tea‐seed cake pellets (TSP), a saponin‐rich byproduct of tea oil (Camellia oleifera) manufacture that causes earthworms to come to the surface and desiccate, temporarily reduced densities of both Lumbricus and Aporrectodea spp. in field plots. However, several applications per year would probably be needed for sustained control. Ring‐billed gulls (Larus delawarensis) showed no apparent adverse effects over a 48 hour period from feeding on TSP‐killed earthworms. We discuss potential value and limitations of TSP and other methods for managing earthworms to reduce airport bird‐strike hazards. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-a57679ce5079426388e8bcb24efa4862
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-a57679ce5079426388e8bcb24efa48622025-08-20T02:36:23ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402015-06-0139243444210.1002/wsb.545Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airportsThomas W. Seamans0Bradley F. Blackwell1Glen E. Bernhardt2Daniel A. Potter3United States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Wildlife Services/National Wildlife Research CenterOhio Field StationSanduskyOH44870USAUnited States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Wildlife Services/National Wildlife Research CenterOhio Field StationSanduskyOH44870USAUnited States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Wildlife Services/National Wildlife Research CenterOhio Field StationSanduskyOH44870USADepartment of Entomology, S‐225 Agriculture Science Building NUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKY40546‐0091USAABSTRACT Earthworms originating from Europe (e.g., Lumbricus spp., Aporrectodea spp.), which are common in the United States and southern Canada can create hazardous conditions at airports by attracting birds that pose a threat to aircraft. These nonnative earthworms are also considered pests on golf courses and sports fields, as well as having detrimental effects on temperate boreal forests. No toxicants or repellents are currently registered for earthworm control in the United States. Our purpose was to identify products that could be used to repel or suppress nonnative earthworms on airports or other managed sites where they pose a hazard or nuisance. We conducted experiments on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Plum Brook Station, Ohio, USA, and at an area about 15 km south of this site, during 2007–2013. We hypothesized that either abrasiveness or extreme low or high pH levels would be characteristic of an efficacious repellent. Ammonium sulfate fertilizer (an acidic treatment) repelled Lumbricus terrestris in choice tests. However, 6 applications of ammonium sulfate over 2 years only reduced the field density of Aporrectodea spp., and not Lumbricus spp. Application of tea‐seed cake pellets (TSP), a saponin‐rich byproduct of tea oil (Camellia oleifera) manufacture that causes earthworms to come to the surface and desiccate, temporarily reduced densities of both Lumbricus and Aporrectodea spp. in field plots. However, several applications per year would probably be needed for sustained control. Ring‐billed gulls (Larus delawarensis) showed no apparent adverse effects over a 48 hour period from feeding on TSP‐killed earthworms. We discuss potential value and limitations of TSP and other methods for managing earthworms to reduce airport bird‐strike hazards. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.545airportAporrectodeabird–aircraft collisionsCamellia oleiferaearthworm controlfertilizer
spellingShingle Thomas W. Seamans
Bradley F. Blackwell
Glen E. Bernhardt
Daniel A. Potter
Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
Wildlife Society Bulletin
airport
Aporrectodea
bird–aircraft collisions
Camellia oleifera
earthworm control
fertilizer
title Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
title_full Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
title_fullStr Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
title_full_unstemmed Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
title_short Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
title_sort assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports
topic airport
Aporrectodea
bird–aircraft collisions
Camellia oleifera
earthworm control
fertilizer
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.545
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaswseamans assessingchemicalcontrolofearthwormsatairports
AT bradleyfblackwell assessingchemicalcontrolofearthwormsatairports
AT glenebernhardt assessingchemicalcontrolofearthwormsatairports
AT danielapotter assessingchemicalcontrolofearthwormsatairports