Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?

Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cenk Soysal, Mehmet Murat Işıkalan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Selcuk University Press 2024-06-01
Series:Genel Tıp Dergisi
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561282180808704
author Cenk Soysal
Mehmet Murat Işıkalan
author_facet Cenk Soysal
Mehmet Murat Işıkalan
author_sort Cenk Soysal
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we intend to review the reliability of the widely used dipstick proteinuria in patients with preeclampsia.Material ve Metod: Urine specimens were obtained from 70 pregnant women visiting high-risk maternity centers at a third-level healthcare institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on their urine dipstick screening test results: negative, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Proteinuria was considered to be present if the urinary dipstick test showed +1 or higher, while protein levels measured in the 24-hour urine collection were considered to indicate proteinuria if they exceeded 300 mg. The degree of correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (Pr/Cr) was compared.Results: The mean age of the 70 preeclampsia patients in the study group was 31.7±6.2, and the mean gestational age was 32.5±4.6. The dipstick test was found to have a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 85.2%. The dipstick test results were grouped as 0, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Statistically significant differences were detected among the groups in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, the amount of protein in the 24-hour urine, and spot urine Pr/Cr (p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). When examining the correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine Pr/Cr, a moderate correlation was found (r=0.65, p<0.001, r=0.55, p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: In hypertensive pregnant individuals, urine dipstick tests demonstrated inadequate performance in ruling out preeclampsia. Consequently, according to our investigation, we posit that the dipstick urine test can be employed as a routine and dependable diagnostic tool for preeclampsia due to its rapid results and cost-effectiveness.
format Article
id doaj-art-a5706889f3074f368508904f0a8a36ca
institution Kabale University
issn 2602-3741
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Selcuk University Press
record_format Article
series Genel Tıp Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-a5706889f3074f368508904f0a8a36ca2025-01-03T01:52:47ZengSelcuk University PressGenel Tıp Dergisi2602-37412024-06-0134328328810.54005/geneltip.1361235 Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia? Cenk Soysal0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-7282Mehmet Murat Işıkalan1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-7063KÜTAHYA SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİBAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we intend to review the reliability of the widely used dipstick proteinuria in patients with preeclampsia.Material ve Metod: Urine specimens were obtained from 70 pregnant women visiting high-risk maternity centers at a third-level healthcare institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on their urine dipstick screening test results: negative, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Proteinuria was considered to be present if the urinary dipstick test showed +1 or higher, while protein levels measured in the 24-hour urine collection were considered to indicate proteinuria if they exceeded 300 mg. The degree of correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (Pr/Cr) was compared.Results: The mean age of the 70 preeclampsia patients in the study group was 31.7±6.2, and the mean gestational age was 32.5±4.6. The dipstick test was found to have a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 85.2%. The dipstick test results were grouped as 0, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Statistically significant differences were detected among the groups in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, the amount of protein in the 24-hour urine, and spot urine Pr/Cr (p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). When examining the correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine Pr/Cr, a moderate correlation was found (r=0.65, p<0.001, r=0.55, p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: In hypertensive pregnant individuals, urine dipstick tests demonstrated inadequate performance in ruling out preeclampsia. Consequently, according to our investigation, we posit that the dipstick urine test can be employed as a routine and dependable diagnostic tool for preeclampsia due to its rapid results and cost-effectiveness.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235
spellingShingle Cenk Soysal
Mehmet Murat Işıkalan
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
Genel Tıp Dergisi
title Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
title_full Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
title_fullStr Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
title_full_unstemmed Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
title_short Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
title_sort does proteinuria measured by dipstick method reflect reality in patients with preeclampsia
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235
work_keys_str_mv AT cenksoysal doesproteinuriameasuredbydipstickmethodreflectrealityinpatientswithpreeclampsia
AT mehmetmuratisıkalan doesproteinuriameasuredbydipstickmethodreflectrealityinpatientswithpreeclampsia