Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Selcuk University Press
2024-06-01
|
Series: | Genel Tıp Dergisi |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841561282180808704 |
---|---|
author | Cenk Soysal Mehmet Murat Işıkalan |
author_facet | Cenk Soysal Mehmet Murat Işıkalan |
author_sort | Cenk Soysal |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we intend to review the reliability of the widely used dipstick proteinuria in patients with preeclampsia.Material ve Metod: Urine specimens were obtained from 70 pregnant women visiting high-risk maternity centers at a third-level healthcare institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on their urine dipstick screening test results: negative, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Proteinuria was considered to be present if the urinary dipstick test showed +1 or higher, while protein levels measured in the 24-hour urine collection were considered to indicate proteinuria if they exceeded 300 mg. The degree of correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (Pr/Cr) was compared.Results: The mean age of the 70 preeclampsia patients in the study group was 31.7±6.2, and the mean gestational age was 32.5±4.6. The dipstick test was found to have a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 85.2%. The dipstick test results were grouped as 0, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Statistically significant differences were detected among the groups in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, the amount of protein in the 24-hour urine, and spot urine Pr/Cr (p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). When examining the correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine Pr/Cr, a moderate correlation was found (r=0.65, p<0.001, r=0.55, p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: In hypertensive pregnant individuals, urine dipstick tests demonstrated inadequate performance in ruling out preeclampsia. Consequently, according to our investigation, we posit that the dipstick urine test can be employed as a routine and dependable diagnostic tool for preeclampsia due to its rapid results and cost-effectiveness. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a5706889f3074f368508904f0a8a36ca |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2602-3741 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
publisher | Selcuk University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Genel Tıp Dergisi |
spelling | doaj-art-a5706889f3074f368508904f0a8a36ca2025-01-03T01:52:47ZengSelcuk University PressGenel Tıp Dergisi2602-37412024-06-0134328328810.54005/geneltip.1361235 Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia? Cenk Soysal0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-7282Mehmet Murat Işıkalan1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-7063KÜTAHYA SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİBAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the proteinuria levels measured by dipstick in complete urine analysis at admission with the proteinuria levels measured in 24-hour collected urine for patients hospitalized with a presumptive diagnosis of preeclampsia. By doing so, we intend to review the reliability of the widely used dipstick proteinuria in patients with preeclampsia.Material ve Metod: Urine specimens were obtained from 70 pregnant women visiting high-risk maternity centers at a third-level healthcare institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on their urine dipstick screening test results: negative, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Proteinuria was considered to be present if the urinary dipstick test showed +1 or higher, while protein levels measured in the 24-hour urine collection were considered to indicate proteinuria if they exceeded 300 mg. The degree of correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (Pr/Cr) was compared.Results: The mean age of the 70 preeclampsia patients in the study group was 31.7±6.2, and the mean gestational age was 32.5±4.6. The dipstick test was found to have a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 85.2%. The dipstick test results were grouped as 0, +1, +2, +3, and higher. Statistically significant differences were detected among the groups in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, the amount of protein in the 24-hour urine, and spot urine Pr/Cr (p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). When examining the correlation between the urine dipstick test and both 24-hour urine samples and spot urine Pr/Cr, a moderate correlation was found (r=0.65, p<0.001, r=0.55, p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: In hypertensive pregnant individuals, urine dipstick tests demonstrated inadequate performance in ruling out preeclampsia. Consequently, according to our investigation, we posit that the dipstick urine test can be employed as a routine and dependable diagnostic tool for preeclampsia due to its rapid results and cost-effectiveness.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235 |
spellingShingle | Cenk Soysal Mehmet Murat Işıkalan Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia? Genel Tıp Dergisi |
title |
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
|
title_full |
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
|
title_fullStr |
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
|
title_short |
Does Proteinuria Measured by Dipstick Method Reflect Reality in Patients with Preeclampsia?
|
title_sort | does proteinuria measured by dipstick method reflect reality in patients with preeclampsia |
url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.54005/geneltip.1361235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cenksoysal doesproteinuriameasuredbydipstickmethodreflectrealityinpatientswithpreeclampsia AT mehmetmuratisıkalan doesproteinuriameasuredbydipstickmethodreflectrealityinpatientswithpreeclampsia |