Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes

Ecosystem services (ES) − the benefits people obtain from ecosystems − are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina Heiß, Friederike Stegmann, Matteo Wolf, Martin Volk, Andrea Kaim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001414
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850059872067911680
author Irina Heiß
Friederike Stegmann
Matteo Wolf
Martin Volk
Andrea Kaim
author_facet Irina Heiß
Friederike Stegmann
Matteo Wolf
Martin Volk
Andrea Kaim
author_sort Irina Heiß
collection DOAJ
description Ecosystem services (ES) − the benefits people obtain from ecosystems − are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Therefore, the spatial targeting of suitable agri-environmental schemes (subsidized by the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU) is needed to address degraded ES in specific areas. To study the interrelations and spatial patterns of ES and agricultural management, there is no compromise between time- and data-intense process-based models and rather simple ES maps based on land use types and single proxies. Therefore, we propose an opportunity map approach, which enables both regional overview and field-specific evaluation on where ES can be improved through agricultural management changes. For this purpose, we developed evaluation criteria and scores for site conditions, management data from 2022 and other spatial environmental parameters based on literature research and expert interviews. These evaluation criteria were assigned scores indicating the opportunity to improve the ES “provision of clean water”, “habitat provision”, “carbon sequestration” and “water regulation” (approximated by drought protection) through altered management. Individual criteria were developed for each ES and weights for the ES criteria resulted from expert interviews using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Except for the management data, all spatial data sets were publicly available. The study region of Northwest Saxony, Germany – an intensively cultivated agricultural area – showed an overall high opportunity to improve ES through management changes. The highest opportunities were identified for the ES “provision of clean water” and “habitat provision”.This novel approach is fast, reproducible and can be transferred to and adapted for other German regions and ES. Therefore, it helps decision-makers to spatially target management suggestions and to support information campaigns or subsidy schemes for management practices with positive impacts on ES.
format Article
id doaj-art-a55ea68b5ec64e2f986d318d0cce8551
institution DOAJ
issn 1470-160X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj-art-a55ea68b5ec64e2f986d318d0cce85512025-08-20T02:50:45ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2025-03-0117211321210.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113212Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapesIrina Heiß0Friederike Stegmann1Matteo Wolf2Martin Volk3Andrea Kaim4Corresponding author.; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstrasse 15 04318 Leipzig, GermanyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstrasse 15 04318 Leipzig, GermanyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstrasse 15 04318 Leipzig, GermanyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstrasse 15 04318 Leipzig, GermanyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstrasse 15 04318 Leipzig, GermanyEcosystem services (ES) − the benefits people obtain from ecosystems − are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Therefore, the spatial targeting of suitable agri-environmental schemes (subsidized by the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU) is needed to address degraded ES in specific areas. To study the interrelations and spatial patterns of ES and agricultural management, there is no compromise between time- and data-intense process-based models and rather simple ES maps based on land use types and single proxies. Therefore, we propose an opportunity map approach, which enables both regional overview and field-specific evaluation on where ES can be improved through agricultural management changes. For this purpose, we developed evaluation criteria and scores for site conditions, management data from 2022 and other spatial environmental parameters based on literature research and expert interviews. These evaluation criteria were assigned scores indicating the opportunity to improve the ES “provision of clean water”, “habitat provision”, “carbon sequestration” and “water regulation” (approximated by drought protection) through altered management. Individual criteria were developed for each ES and weights for the ES criteria resulted from expert interviews using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Except for the management data, all spatial data sets were publicly available. The study region of Northwest Saxony, Germany – an intensively cultivated agricultural area – showed an overall high opportunity to improve ES through management changes. The highest opportunities were identified for the ES “provision of clean water” and “habitat provision”.This novel approach is fast, reproducible and can be transferred to and adapted for other German regions and ES. Therefore, it helps decision-makers to spatially target management suggestions and to support information campaigns or subsidy schemes for management practices with positive impacts on ES.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001414Agri-environmental and climate schemesEcosystem servicesWater qualityCarbon sequestrationBiodiversityDrought protection
spellingShingle Irina Heiß
Friederike Stegmann
Matteo Wolf
Martin Volk
Andrea Kaim
Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
Ecological Indicators
Agri-environmental and climate schemes
Ecosystem services
Water quality
Carbon sequestration
Biodiversity
Drought protection
title Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
title_full Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
title_fullStr Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
title_short Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services – An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
title_sort supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services an opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes
topic Agri-environmental and climate schemes
Ecosystem services
Water quality
Carbon sequestration
Biodiversity
Drought protection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001414
work_keys_str_mv AT irinaheiß supportingthespatialallocationofmanagementpracticestoimproveecosystemservicesanopportunitymapapproachforagriculturallandscapes
AT friederikestegmann supportingthespatialallocationofmanagementpracticestoimproveecosystemservicesanopportunitymapapproachforagriculturallandscapes
AT matteowolf supportingthespatialallocationofmanagementpracticestoimproveecosystemservicesanopportunitymapapproachforagriculturallandscapes
AT martinvolk supportingthespatialallocationofmanagementpracticestoimproveecosystemservicesanopportunitymapapproachforagriculturallandscapes
AT andreakaim supportingthespatialallocationofmanagementpracticestoimproveecosystemservicesanopportunitymapapproachforagriculturallandscapes