A comparative analysis of syntactic complexity in argumentative essays from rhetorical perspective: ChatGPT vs. English native speakers.
This study investigates the syntactic complexity of argumentative essays generated by ChatGPT in comparison to those written by native speakers. By examining cross-rhetorical-stage variation in syntactic complexity, we explore how ChatGPT's writing aligns with or diverges from human argumentati...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Wenlong Liu, Xianming Liu |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329410 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Usability of ChatGPT in the english essay writing proficiency of the BEED students
by: Karl Alvin Aglibot, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Politicians vs ChatGPT
by: Davide Garassino, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Non-native speakers of English or ChatGPT: Who thinks better? [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Mohammed Q. Shormani
Published: (2025-03-01) -
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: prospects and challenges
by: Inhye Jin, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
ChatGPT vs. Orthopedic Residents! Who is the Winner?
by: Semih Yaş, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)