Denying the Existence of Consensus or Denying its Probative Value? A Critique of McIntyre’s Proposal Concerning Science Denial
In this article, we try to argue, against McIntyre’s proposal in How to talk to a science denier, that there is a relevant difference between various forms of science denialism. Specifically, we contend that there is a significant distinction to be made between those forms of denialism which deny t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Claudio Javier Cormick, Valeria Carolina Edelsztein |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/93904 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Sobre el respeto a la evidencia empírica. McIntyre en La actitud científica.
by: Mariano Sanjuan
Published: (2021-01-01) -
What Do Science and Historical Denialists Deny – If Any – When Addressing Certainties in Wittgenstein’s Sense?
by: Ariso Jose Maria
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Simplified Integrity Checking for an Expressive Class of Denial Constraints
by: Davide Martinenghi
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Gye & Perkes v McIntyre
by: Lynden Griggs
Published: (1991-01-01) -
Towards a Better Denialism
by: Helen Paynter
Published: (2025-01-01)