Is research funding always beneficial? A cross-disciplinary analysis of U.K. research 2014–20
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli, Emma Stuart, Meiko Makita, Cristina I. Font-Julián, Paul Wilson, Jonathan Levitt |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The MIT Press
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Quantitative Science Studies |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00254 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Google Books, Scopus, Microsoft Academic and Mendeley for impact assessment of doctoral dissertations: A multidisciplinary analysis of the UK
by: Kayvan Kousha, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Covid-19 refereeing duration and impact in major medical journals
by: Kayvan Kousha, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
by: Thelwall Mike, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Is high-rise development always beneficial to health?
by: Yuval Arbel, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Fairness in Higher Education Research and Innovation Funding in the UK
by: Champika L. Liyanage, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)