The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia

Background. Helicobacter pylori is considered the most widespread bacterial pathogen worldwide. Successful eradication protocols are well established, highlighting the importance of appropriate infection detection. Noninvasive testing (NIT) methods are commonly used to detect infection, with test se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy Wearne, Safaa Nadeem, Bruce Wilson, Kylie J. Mansfield, Caitlin Keighley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:GastroHep
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6642474
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850160676116365312
author Timothy Wearne
Safaa Nadeem
Bruce Wilson
Kylie J. Mansfield
Caitlin Keighley
author_facet Timothy Wearne
Safaa Nadeem
Bruce Wilson
Kylie J. Mansfield
Caitlin Keighley
author_sort Timothy Wearne
collection DOAJ
description Background. Helicobacter pylori is considered the most widespread bacterial pathogen worldwide. Successful eradication protocols are well established, highlighting the importance of appropriate infection detection. Noninvasive testing (NIT) methods are commonly used to detect infection, with test selection dependent on access and previous infection. This study examined trends in NIT by age group and test selection for eradication screening as well as examining H. pylori area prevalence by socioeconomic status (SES) in the Illawarra Shoalhaven and surrounding region. Materials and Methods. This retrospective cohort quantitative study is based on 20,998 NIT including stool antigen test (SAT), urea breath test (UBT), or H. pylori serology via Southern.IML Pathology between 2018 and 2020. Test percentage positives per and total test percentages within age groups were calculated for each NIT. Positive sample postcode data was assigned to socioeconomic percentiles. Total test utilisation and prevalence were calculated and depicted as geospatial representations. Results. Overall: 58.5% UBT, 31% serology, and 10.5% SAT were performed, with 14.7% positive for any NIT. Highest percent positive age group: SAT 80-89yo (18.6%), UBT 0-9yo (20.8%), and serology 90–99yo (32.6%). Test majority per age group: SAT 0-9yo (67.4%), UBT 10-89yo (59.4%), and serology 90-99yo (48.3%). A trend was seen between increasing infection prevalence and increasing socioeconomic disadvantage (p=0.161, R2=0.0361). Prevalence rates visually correlated with total test utilisation. Conclusions. SAT was underutilised compared to UBT or serology. Serology was inappropriately used in older age groups, and the result validity was questioned following confirmed infection. SAT is a viable alternative for use in these settings. No significant correlation was seen between lower SES areas and higher H. pylori infection prevalence, but low-test utilisation suggests likely prevalence underestimation within the studied area and may indicate reduced accessibility to healthcare.
format Article
id doaj-art-a516e7f2485843a39eee286171dfe0fd
institution OA Journals
issn 1478-1239
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series GastroHep
spelling doaj-art-a516e7f2485843a39eee286171dfe0fd2025-08-20T02:23:05ZengWileyGastroHep1478-12392023-01-01202310.1155/2023/6642474The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of AustraliaTimothy Wearne0Safaa Nadeem1Bruce Wilson2Kylie J. Mansfield3Caitlin Keighley4Graduate School of MedicineGraduate School of MedicineGraduate School of MedicineGraduate School of MedicineGraduate School of MedicineBackground. Helicobacter pylori is considered the most widespread bacterial pathogen worldwide. Successful eradication protocols are well established, highlighting the importance of appropriate infection detection. Noninvasive testing (NIT) methods are commonly used to detect infection, with test selection dependent on access and previous infection. This study examined trends in NIT by age group and test selection for eradication screening as well as examining H. pylori area prevalence by socioeconomic status (SES) in the Illawarra Shoalhaven and surrounding region. Materials and Methods. This retrospective cohort quantitative study is based on 20,998 NIT including stool antigen test (SAT), urea breath test (UBT), or H. pylori serology via Southern.IML Pathology between 2018 and 2020. Test percentage positives per and total test percentages within age groups were calculated for each NIT. Positive sample postcode data was assigned to socioeconomic percentiles. Total test utilisation and prevalence were calculated and depicted as geospatial representations. Results. Overall: 58.5% UBT, 31% serology, and 10.5% SAT were performed, with 14.7% positive for any NIT. Highest percent positive age group: SAT 80-89yo (18.6%), UBT 0-9yo (20.8%), and serology 90–99yo (32.6%). Test majority per age group: SAT 0-9yo (67.4%), UBT 10-89yo (59.4%), and serology 90-99yo (48.3%). A trend was seen between increasing infection prevalence and increasing socioeconomic disadvantage (p=0.161, R2=0.0361). Prevalence rates visually correlated with total test utilisation. Conclusions. SAT was underutilised compared to UBT or serology. Serology was inappropriately used in older age groups, and the result validity was questioned following confirmed infection. SAT is a viable alternative for use in these settings. No significant correlation was seen between lower SES areas and higher H. pylori infection prevalence, but low-test utilisation suggests likely prevalence underestimation within the studied area and may indicate reduced accessibility to healthcare.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6642474
spellingShingle Timothy Wearne
Safaa Nadeem
Bruce Wilson
Kylie J. Mansfield
Caitlin Keighley
The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
GastroHep
title The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
title_full The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
title_fullStr The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
title_full_unstemmed The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
title_short The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
title_sort suitability of stool antigen testing in the detection of helicobacter pylori in a regional and rural area of australia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6642474
work_keys_str_mv AT timothywearne thesuitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT safaanadeem thesuitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT brucewilson thesuitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT kyliejmansfield thesuitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT caitlinkeighley thesuitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT timothywearne suitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT safaanadeem suitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT brucewilson suitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT kyliejmansfield suitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia
AT caitlinkeighley suitabilityofstoolantigentestinginthedetectionofhelicobacterpyloriinaregionalandruralareaofaustralia