Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates

Renal disease may accidentally be discovered during urinalysis. This study was conducted to examine the usefulness of dipstick urinalysis screening in healthy neonates for the diagnosis of underlying renal disease and to study the magnitude of abnormal urinalysis in apparently healthy neonates. Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Behnaz Falakaflaki, Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011-06-01
Series:Pediatrics and Neonatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187595721100043X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850160664870387712
author Behnaz Falakaflaki
Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab
Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
author_facet Behnaz Falakaflaki
Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab
Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
author_sort Behnaz Falakaflaki
collection DOAJ
description Renal disease may accidentally be discovered during urinalysis. This study was conducted to examine the usefulness of dipstick urinalysis screening in healthy neonates for the diagnosis of underlying renal disease and to study the magnitude of abnormal urinalysis in apparently healthy neonates. Methods: In this descriptive study, voided urine samples were obtained from 400 apparently healthy neonates and tested using urine dipstick. The reaction of dipstick strip was read visually by a trained nurse. In cases with an abnormal urine analysis, a second screen test was performed within a week, and for those with persistent abnormalities, complete diagnostic tests were done. Results: On the first urinalysis, 375 (94%) subjects were normal and 25 (6%) had abnormalities: 23 had proteinuria (5.75%), one was blood positive (0.25%), and one was both protein and blood positive (0.25%). Male neonates had a higher proportion of proteinuria than female neonates (p=0.038). In the second examination, proteinuria was found in five (1.25%) neonates, but the proportion of other abnormalities did not change. In follow-up investigations, ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux were recognized in two infants who had blood-positive or combined blood- and protein-positive results on their first tests. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that dipstick test during neonatal period could be used for early diagnosis of renal diseases.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4e5e251dcca4c6199cfa3d7206b307d
institution OA Journals
issn 1875-9572
language English
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Pediatrics and Neonatology
spelling doaj-art-a4e5e251dcca4c6199cfa3d7206b307d2025-08-20T02:23:05ZengElsevierPediatrics and Neonatology1875-95722011-06-0152316116410.1016/j.pedneo.2011.03.012Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy NeonatesBehnaz Falakaflaki0Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab1Saeideh Mazloomzadeh2Department of Pediatrics, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranRenal disease may accidentally be discovered during urinalysis. This study was conducted to examine the usefulness of dipstick urinalysis screening in healthy neonates for the diagnosis of underlying renal disease and to study the magnitude of abnormal urinalysis in apparently healthy neonates. Methods: In this descriptive study, voided urine samples were obtained from 400 apparently healthy neonates and tested using urine dipstick. The reaction of dipstick strip was read visually by a trained nurse. In cases with an abnormal urine analysis, a second screen test was performed within a week, and for those with persistent abnormalities, complete diagnostic tests were done. Results: On the first urinalysis, 375 (94%) subjects were normal and 25 (6%) had abnormalities: 23 had proteinuria (5.75%), one was blood positive (0.25%), and one was both protein and blood positive (0.25%). Male neonates had a higher proportion of proteinuria than female neonates (p=0.038). In the second examination, proteinuria was found in five (1.25%) neonates, but the proportion of other abnormalities did not change. In follow-up investigations, ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux were recognized in two infants who had blood-positive or combined blood- and protein-positive results on their first tests. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that dipstick test during neonatal period could be used for early diagnosis of renal diseases.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187595721100043Xdipstickhealthy neonateurinalysis
spellingShingle Behnaz Falakaflaki
Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab
Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
Pediatrics and Neonatology
dipstick
healthy neonate
urinalysis
title Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
title_full Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
title_fullStr Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
title_full_unstemmed Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
title_short Dipstick Urinalysis Screening of Healthy Neonates
title_sort dipstick urinalysis screening of healthy neonates
topic dipstick
healthy neonate
urinalysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187595721100043X
work_keys_str_mv AT behnazfalakaflaki dipstickurinalysisscreeningofhealthyneonates
AT seyednouraddinmousavinasab dipstickurinalysisscreeningofhealthyneonates
AT saeidehmazloomzadeh dipstickurinalysisscreeningofhealthyneonates