A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation
Abstract Clarifying the rights subjects and their corresponding rights in data element circulation, and constructing a rational data rights confirmation framework,are crucial prerequisites for ensuring the smooth circulation of data elements. Employing an improved evidence-based model, this paper co...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04452-4 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850197222481723392 |
|---|---|
| author | Jianbo Zhao Huailiang Liu Shanzhuang Zhang Kai Shu Qisen Fang Weili Zhang Chufan Tan Xiaojin Zhang Yuehai Wang Yanwei Qi |
| author_facet | Jianbo Zhao Huailiang Liu Shanzhuang Zhang Kai Shu Qisen Fang Weili Zhang Chufan Tan Xiaojin Zhang Yuehai Wang Yanwei Qi |
| author_sort | Jianbo Zhao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Clarifying the rights subjects and their corresponding rights in data element circulation, and constructing a rational data rights confirmation framework,are crucial prerequisites for ensuring the smooth circulation of data elements. Employing an improved evidence-based model, this paper conducts evidence-based research on the traditional methodologies of data rights confirmation in the three major economic entities: the European Union, the United States, and China. The findings indicate that the European Union demonstrates strong systematicity and innovativeness in data rights confirmation, the United States exhibits strong specificity and adaptability, and China shows strong collectivism and developmental characteristics. As a result, this paper proposes a “five rights separation” framework for ternary data subjects, which balances the interests and needs of different data subjects while ensuring both efficiency and security in data element circulation. For the first time, this paper provides a new construction method and theoretical framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation.Future research can expand the scope and depth of evidence-based studies, conduct empirical research, and implement pilot projects. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a4de124f0a8e4fc2a3b160ec38d13459 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2662-9992 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-a4de124f0a8e4fc2a3b160ec38d134592025-08-20T02:13:14ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922025-02-0112111710.1057/s41599-025-04452-4A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulationJianbo Zhao0Huailiang Liu1Shanzhuang Zhang2Kai Shu3Qisen Fang4Weili Zhang5Chufan Tan6Xiaojin Zhang7Yuehai Wang8Yanwei Qi9School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an International Studies UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversitySchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian UniversitySchool of Economics & Management, Xidian UniversityAbstract Clarifying the rights subjects and their corresponding rights in data element circulation, and constructing a rational data rights confirmation framework,are crucial prerequisites for ensuring the smooth circulation of data elements. Employing an improved evidence-based model, this paper conducts evidence-based research on the traditional methodologies of data rights confirmation in the three major economic entities: the European Union, the United States, and China. The findings indicate that the European Union demonstrates strong systematicity and innovativeness in data rights confirmation, the United States exhibits strong specificity and adaptability, and China shows strong collectivism and developmental characteristics. As a result, this paper proposes a “five rights separation” framework for ternary data subjects, which balances the interests and needs of different data subjects while ensuring both efficiency and security in data element circulation. For the first time, this paper provides a new construction method and theoretical framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation.Future research can expand the scope and depth of evidence-based studies, conduct empirical research, and implement pilot projects.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04452-4 |
| spellingShingle | Jianbo Zhao Huailiang Liu Shanzhuang Zhang Kai Shu Qisen Fang Weili Zhang Chufan Tan Xiaojin Zhang Yuehai Wang Yanwei Qi A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| title | A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| title_full | A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| title_fullStr | A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| title_full_unstemmed | A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| title_short | A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| title_sort | five rights separation framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04452-4 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jianbozhao afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT huailiangliu afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT shanzhuangzhang afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT kaishu afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT qisenfang afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT weilizhang afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT chufantan afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT xiaojinzhang afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT yuehaiwang afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT yanweiqi afiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT jianbozhao fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT huailiangliu fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT shanzhuangzhang fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT kaishu fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT qisenfang fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT weilizhang fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT chufantan fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT xiaojinzhang fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT yuehaiwang fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation AT yanweiqi fiverightsseparationframeworkfordatarightsconfirmationindataelementcirculation |