Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging

Background Labeled antibodies are excellent imaging agents in oncology to non-invasively visualize cancer-related antigens expression levels. However, tumor tracer uptake (TTU) of specific antibodies in-vivo may be inferior to non-specific IgG in some cases. Objectives To explore factors affecting l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linhan Zhang MD, Lianmeng Zhao MS, Xue Lin MD, Sheng Zhao MD, Wenbin Pan MS, Dandan Wang MD, Zhongqi Sun MD, Jinping Li MD, Zonghui Liang MD, Rongjun Zhang MS, Huijie Jiang MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-06-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/15353508241261473
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841562112291241984
author Linhan Zhang MD
Lianmeng Zhao MS
Xue Lin MD
Sheng Zhao MD
Wenbin Pan MS
Dandan Wang MD
Zhongqi Sun MD
Jinping Li MD
Zonghui Liang MD
Rongjun Zhang MS
Huijie Jiang MD
author_facet Linhan Zhang MD
Lianmeng Zhao MS
Xue Lin MD
Sheng Zhao MD
Wenbin Pan MS
Dandan Wang MD
Zhongqi Sun MD
Jinping Li MD
Zonghui Liang MD
Rongjun Zhang MS
Huijie Jiang MD
author_sort Linhan Zhang MD
collection DOAJ
description Background Labeled antibodies are excellent imaging agents in oncology to non-invasively visualize cancer-related antigens expression levels. However, tumor tracer uptake (TTU) of specific antibodies in-vivo may be inferior to non-specific IgG in some cases. Objectives To explore factors affecting labeled antibody visualization by PD-L1 specific and non-specific imaging of nude mouse tumors. Methods TTU was observed in RKO model on Cerenkov luminescence (CL) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of radionuclide 131 I or NIRF dyes labeled Atezolizumab and IgG. A mixture of NIRF dyes labeled Atezolizumab and 131 I-labeled IgG was injected, and TTU was observed in the RKO and HCT8 model by NIRF/CL dual-modality in-situ imaging. TTU were observed by 131 I-labeled Atezolizumab and IgG in-vitro distribution. Results Labeled IgG concentrated more in tumors than Atezolizumab. NIRF/CL imaging in 24 to 168 h showed that TTU gradually decreased over time, which decreased more slowly on CL imaging compared to NIRF imaging. The distribution data in-vitro showed that TTU of 131 I-labeled IgG was higher than that of 131 I-labeled Atezolizumab at any time point. Conclusion Non-specific IgG may not be suitable as a control for Atezolizumab in comparing tumor PD-L1 expression in nude mice via labeled antibody optical imaging under certain circumstances.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4d9b4dd41f94961bf597b29750b6b17
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-a4d9b4dd41f94961bf597b29750b6b172025-01-03T01:06:53ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212024-06-012310.1177/15353508241261473Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ ImagingLinhan Zhang MD0Lianmeng Zhao MS1Xue Lin MD2Sheng Zhao MD3Wenbin Pan MS4Dandan Wang MD5Zhongqi Sun MD6Jinping Li MD7Zonghui Liang MD8Rongjun Zhang MS9Huijie Jiang MD10 Department of Nuclear Medicine, , Harbin, China Ultrasound Department, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, China Department of Radiology, , Shanghai, China Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, China Department of Radiology, , Harbin, ChinaBackground Labeled antibodies are excellent imaging agents in oncology to non-invasively visualize cancer-related antigens expression levels. However, tumor tracer uptake (TTU) of specific antibodies in-vivo may be inferior to non-specific IgG in some cases. Objectives To explore factors affecting labeled antibody visualization by PD-L1 specific and non-specific imaging of nude mouse tumors. Methods TTU was observed in RKO model on Cerenkov luminescence (CL) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of radionuclide 131 I or NIRF dyes labeled Atezolizumab and IgG. A mixture of NIRF dyes labeled Atezolizumab and 131 I-labeled IgG was injected, and TTU was observed in the RKO and HCT8 model by NIRF/CL dual-modality in-situ imaging. TTU were observed by 131 I-labeled Atezolizumab and IgG in-vitro distribution. Results Labeled IgG concentrated more in tumors than Atezolizumab. NIRF/CL imaging in 24 to 168 h showed that TTU gradually decreased over time, which decreased more slowly on CL imaging compared to NIRF imaging. The distribution data in-vitro showed that TTU of 131 I-labeled IgG was higher than that of 131 I-labeled Atezolizumab at any time point. Conclusion Non-specific IgG may not be suitable as a control for Atezolizumab in comparing tumor PD-L1 expression in nude mice via labeled antibody optical imaging under certain circumstances.https://doi.org/10.1177/15353508241261473
spellingShingle Linhan Zhang MD
Lianmeng Zhao MS
Xue Lin MD
Sheng Zhao MD
Wenbin Pan MS
Dandan Wang MD
Zhongqi Sun MD
Jinping Li MD
Zonghui Liang MD
Rongjun Zhang MS
Huijie Jiang MD
Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
Molecular Imaging
title Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
title_full Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
title_short Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging
title_sort comparison of tumor non specific and pd l1 specific imaging by near infrared fluorescence cerenkov luminescence dual modality in situ imaging
url https://doi.org/10.1177/15353508241261473
work_keys_str_mv AT linhanzhangmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT lianmengzhaoms comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT xuelinmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT shengzhaomd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT wenbinpanms comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT dandanwangmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT zhongqisunmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT jinpinglimd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT zonghuiliangmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT rongjunzhangms comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging
AT huijiejiangmd comparisonoftumornonspecificandpdl1specificimagingbynearinfraredfluorescencecerenkovluminescencedualmodalityinsituimaging