Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI
For efficient radio network planning, empirical path loss (PL) prediction models are utilized to predict signal attenuation in different environments. Alternatively, machine learning (ML) models are proposed to predict path loss. While empirical models are transparent and require less computational...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Future Internet |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/4/155 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849713383590330368 |
|---|---|
| author | Hamed Khalili Hannes Frey Maria A. Wimmer |
| author_facet | Hamed Khalili Hannes Frey Maria A. Wimmer |
| author_sort | Hamed Khalili |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For efficient radio network planning, empirical path loss (PL) prediction models are utilized to predict signal attenuation in different environments. Alternatively, machine learning (ML) models are proposed to predict path loss. While empirical models are transparent and require less computational capacity, their predictions are not able to generate accurate forecasting in complex environments. While ML models are precise and can cope with complex terrains, their opaque nature hampers building trust and relying assertively on their predictions. To fill the gap between transparency and accuracy, in this paper, we utilize glass box ML using Microsoft research’s explainable boosting machines (EBM) together with the PL data measured for a university campus environment. Moreover, polar coordinate transformation is applied in our paper, which unravels the superior explanation capacity of the feature transmitting angle beyond the feature distance. PL predictions of glass box ML are compared with predictions of black box ML models as well as those generated by empirical models. The glass box EBM exhibits the highest performance. The glass box ML, furthermore, sheds light on the important explanatory features and the magnitude of their effects on signal attenuation in the underlying propagation environment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a4ca2f4145b54583aa6be166df9f84a1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1999-5903 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Future Internet |
| spelling | doaj-art-a4ca2f4145b54583aa6be166df9f84a12025-08-20T03:13:58ZengMDPI AGFuture Internet1999-59032025-03-0117415510.3390/fi17040155Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AIHamed Khalili0Hannes Frey1Maria A. Wimmer2Research Group Computer Networks, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Koblenz, D-56070 Koblenz, GermanyResearch Group Computer Networks, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Koblenz, D-56070 Koblenz, GermanyResearch Group E-Government, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Koblenz, D-56070 Koblenz, GermanyFor efficient radio network planning, empirical path loss (PL) prediction models are utilized to predict signal attenuation in different environments. Alternatively, machine learning (ML) models are proposed to predict path loss. While empirical models are transparent and require less computational capacity, their predictions are not able to generate accurate forecasting in complex environments. While ML models are precise and can cope with complex terrains, their opaque nature hampers building trust and relying assertively on their predictions. To fill the gap between transparency and accuracy, in this paper, we utilize glass box ML using Microsoft research’s explainable boosting machines (EBM) together with the PL data measured for a university campus environment. Moreover, polar coordinate transformation is applied in our paper, which unravels the superior explanation capacity of the feature transmitting angle beyond the feature distance. PL predictions of glass box ML are compared with predictions of black box ML models as well as those generated by empirical models. The glass box EBM exhibits the highest performance. The glass box ML, furthermore, sheds light on the important explanatory features and the magnitude of their effects on signal attenuation in the underlying propagation environment.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/4/155path lossradio propagationwireless channelcomparative analysis of machine learning methodsexplainable artificial intelligence |
| spellingShingle | Hamed Khalili Hannes Frey Maria A. Wimmer Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI Future Internet path loss radio propagation wireless channel comparative analysis of machine learning methods explainable artificial intelligence |
| title | Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI |
| title_full | Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI |
| title_fullStr | Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI |
| title_full_unstemmed | Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI |
| title_short | Balancing Prediction Accuracy and Explanation Power of Path Loss Modeling in a University Campus Environment via Explainable AI |
| title_sort | balancing prediction accuracy and explanation power of path loss modeling in a university campus environment via explainable ai |
| topic | path loss radio propagation wireless channel comparative analysis of machine learning methods explainable artificial intelligence |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/4/155 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hamedkhalili balancingpredictionaccuracyandexplanationpowerofpathlossmodelinginauniversitycampusenvironmentviaexplainableai AT hannesfrey balancingpredictionaccuracyandexplanationpowerofpathlossmodelinginauniversitycampusenvironmentviaexplainableai AT mariaawimmer balancingpredictionaccuracyandexplanationpowerofpathlossmodelinginauniversitycampusenvironmentviaexplainableai |