The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices

The article analyses the US policies in the post-Soviet space as an example of how a great power can stimulate specific political order in a region. The author states that the US strategic framework in this space does not contradict the deterrence imperatives towards the USSR. Depending on its short...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexey A. Davydov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade 2025-04-01
Series:The Review of International Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://thereviewofinternationalaffairs.rs/wp-content/uploads/RI/2025/1193/RI-2025-1193-article-2.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850182553846153216
author Alexey A. Davydov
author_facet Alexey A. Davydov
author_sort Alexey A. Davydov
collection DOAJ
description The article analyses the US policies in the post-Soviet space as an example of how a great power can stimulate specific political order in a region. The author states that the US strategic framework in this space does not contradict the deterrence imperatives towards the USSR. Depending on its short-term goals in relations with Russia, US foreign policy follows a seven- or eight-year cycle of stimulation of the decentralisation processes in the region. After the dissolution of the USSR, the first clear manifestation of differences between Moscow and Washington, which occurred in 1999, was followed by three waves of tensions in 2007, 2014, and 2022. In all four cases, the US raised its strategic attention towards other former Soviet republics. In each sub-region of this space, the US applies different sets of practices that would be most efficient and suitable for each country in fulfilling current American political imperatives. Throughout the last three decades, the United States demonstrated an effective usage of different sets of “carrot and stick” political approaches, mostly carried out via ideological, economic, military, diplomatic, and multilateral foreign political means, both towards these post-Soviet states and Russia. In each state of the post-Soviet space, Washington applied a unique set of political practices and tactics, often following the same goal of undermining Moscow’s power and stimulating decentralisation processes among the former Soviet republics.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4bb432c7f6b40d7b15ae388803e017d
institution OA Journals
issn 0486-6096
2955-9030
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade
record_format Article
series The Review of International Affairs
spelling doaj-art-a4bb432c7f6b40d7b15ae388803e017d2025-08-20T02:17:36ZengInstitute of International Politics and Economics, BelgradeThe Review of International Affairs0486-60962955-90302025-04-017611933762https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ria.2025.76.1193.2The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and PracticesAlexey A. Davydov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-8746Senior Research Fellow, Centre for North American Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), Moscow, Russian FederationThe article analyses the US policies in the post-Soviet space as an example of how a great power can stimulate specific political order in a region. The author states that the US strategic framework in this space does not contradict the deterrence imperatives towards the USSR. Depending on its short-term goals in relations with Russia, US foreign policy follows a seven- or eight-year cycle of stimulation of the decentralisation processes in the region. After the dissolution of the USSR, the first clear manifestation of differences between Moscow and Washington, which occurred in 1999, was followed by three waves of tensions in 2007, 2014, and 2022. In all four cases, the US raised its strategic attention towards other former Soviet republics. In each sub-region of this space, the US applies different sets of practices that would be most efficient and suitable for each country in fulfilling current American political imperatives. Throughout the last three decades, the United States demonstrated an effective usage of different sets of “carrot and stick” political approaches, mostly carried out via ideological, economic, military, diplomatic, and multilateral foreign political means, both towards these post-Soviet states and Russia. In each state of the post-Soviet space, Washington applied a unique set of political practices and tactics, often following the same goal of undermining Moscow’s power and stimulating decentralisation processes among the former Soviet republics.https://thereviewofinternationalaffairs.rs/wp-content/uploads/RI/2025/1193/RI-2025-1193-article-2.pdfrussiaeurasiacentral asiacaucasusunited statesukraineliberal world orderdemocracy promotion
spellingShingle Alexey A. Davydov
The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
The Review of International Affairs
russia
eurasia
central asia
caucasus
united states
ukraine
liberal world order
democracy promotion
title The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
title_full The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
title_fullStr The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
title_full_unstemmed The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
title_short The US Power Projection in the Post-Soviet Space: Policies and Practices
title_sort us power projection in the post soviet space policies and practices
topic russia
eurasia
central asia
caucasus
united states
ukraine
liberal world order
democracy promotion
url https://thereviewofinternationalaffairs.rs/wp-content/uploads/RI/2025/1193/RI-2025-1193-article-2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeyadavydov theuspowerprojectioninthepostsovietspacepoliciesandpractices
AT alexeyadavydov uspowerprojectioninthepostsovietspacepoliciesandpractices