Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.

<h4>Background</h4>In primary healthcare (PHC) settings, initiatives to identify mental health care needs (MHCN) are needed to ensure integral and quality care. However, there are few valid tools supporting health professionals in decision-making. This study aimed to obtain evidence of v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça, Ana Alice Freire de Sousa, Ilana Eshriqui, Flávio Rebustini, Daiana Bonfim, Daniella Sampaio Zorzi, Camila Nascimento Monteiro, Talita Rewa, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323833
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850099892825882624
author Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça
Ana Alice Freire de Sousa
Ilana Eshriqui
Flávio Rebustini
Daiana Bonfim
Daniella Sampaio Zorzi
Camila Nascimento Monteiro
Talita Rewa
Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida
author_facet Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça
Ana Alice Freire de Sousa
Ilana Eshriqui
Flávio Rebustini
Daiana Bonfim
Daniella Sampaio Zorzi
Camila Nascimento Monteiro
Talita Rewa
Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida
author_sort Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>In primary healthcare (PHC) settings, initiatives to identify mental health care needs (MHCN) are needed to ensure integral and quality care. However, there are few valid tools supporting health professionals in decision-making. This study aimed to obtain evidence of validity of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM) in PHC.<h4>Methods</h4>A group of health professional experts developed 130 dichotomous items, which were assessed by a heterogeneous group of panelists from different regions of Brazil (n = 73). Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated, resulting in a second version of the scale with 43 items, which was administered to 879 healthcare users to provide evidence of internal-structure validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Dimensionality was assessed through robust parallel analysis and the model was then cross-validated to create the final CuidaSM version. The CuidaSM score was subjected to normalization.<h4>Results</h4>The final version of CuidaSM comprised 31 items, which were divided into two blocks: a "self-referred" block with 17 items distributed into five dimensions (Social Relationships, Functioning, Autonomy, Impulsiveness and Aggressiveness, and Spirituality) and a "health professional evaluation" block with 14 items and three dimensions (Violence, Self-aggression and Suicidal Behavior, and Caregiving Plan). The final model's explained variance was 62.7%. Dimensionality values pointed to a multidimensional model (UNICO = 0.79; ECV = 0.69; and MIREAL = 0.22). All indicators were within adequate and satisfactory limits. CuidaSM score normalization stratified MHCN into four strata.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The CuidaSM scale is a concise instrument combining healthcare user self-assessment and health professional clinical assessment. CuidaSM show satisfactory evidence of validity and was found to be a consistent, reliable, and robust instrument capable of accurately measuring MHCN in the PHC setting in Brazil.
format Article
id doaj-art-a470795c2c3c42dfacbd17fc4f5e236e
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-a470795c2c3c42dfacbd17fc4f5e236e2025-08-20T02:40:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032383310.1371/journal.pone.0323833Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.Joana Moscoso Teixeira de MendonçaAna Alice Freire de SousaIlana EshriquiFlávio RebustiniDaiana BonfimDaniella Sampaio ZorziCamila Nascimento MonteiroTalita RewaLeticia Yamawaka de Almeida<h4>Background</h4>In primary healthcare (PHC) settings, initiatives to identify mental health care needs (MHCN) are needed to ensure integral and quality care. However, there are few valid tools supporting health professionals in decision-making. This study aimed to obtain evidence of validity of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM) in PHC.<h4>Methods</h4>A group of health professional experts developed 130 dichotomous items, which were assessed by a heterogeneous group of panelists from different regions of Brazil (n = 73). Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated, resulting in a second version of the scale with 43 items, which was administered to 879 healthcare users to provide evidence of internal-structure validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Dimensionality was assessed through robust parallel analysis and the model was then cross-validated to create the final CuidaSM version. The CuidaSM score was subjected to normalization.<h4>Results</h4>The final version of CuidaSM comprised 31 items, which were divided into two blocks: a "self-referred" block with 17 items distributed into five dimensions (Social Relationships, Functioning, Autonomy, Impulsiveness and Aggressiveness, and Spirituality) and a "health professional evaluation" block with 14 items and three dimensions (Violence, Self-aggression and Suicidal Behavior, and Caregiving Plan). The final model's explained variance was 62.7%. Dimensionality values pointed to a multidimensional model (UNICO = 0.79; ECV = 0.69; and MIREAL = 0.22). All indicators were within adequate and satisfactory limits. CuidaSM score normalization stratified MHCN into four strata.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The CuidaSM scale is a concise instrument combining healthcare user self-assessment and health professional clinical assessment. CuidaSM show satisfactory evidence of validity and was found to be a consistent, reliable, and robust instrument capable of accurately measuring MHCN in the PHC setting in Brazil.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323833
spellingShingle Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça
Ana Alice Freire de Sousa
Ilana Eshriqui
Flávio Rebustini
Daiana Bonfim
Daniella Sampaio Zorzi
Camila Nascimento Monteiro
Talita Rewa
Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida
Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
PLoS ONE
title Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
title_full Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
title_fullStr Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
title_short Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.
title_sort brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs cuidasm evidence of validity in primary health care
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323833
work_keys_str_mv AT joanamoscosoteixeirademendonca brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT anaalicefreiredesousa brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT ilanaeshriqui brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT flaviorebustini brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT daianabonfim brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT daniellasampaiozorzi brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT camilanascimentomonteiro brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT talitarewa brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare
AT leticiayamawakadealmeida brazilianscaleforevaluationofmentalhealthcareneedscuidasmevidenceofvalidityinprimaryhealthcare