HADÎTS DLA’ÎF DAN KEHUJJAHANNYA (Telaah terhadap Kontroversi Penerapan Ulama’ sebagai Sumber Hukum)
Hadits is the second argumentation (hujjah) source after al-<br />Qur’ân. However, there are many hadits refused becoming as an<br />argumentation. According to the perspective of a Hadîts whether<br />it is accepted or refused, it has three stages, namely shahîh,<br />hasan,...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Fakultas Syariah IAIN Madura
2013-09-01
|
| Series: | Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial |
| Online Access: | http://ejournal.stainpamekasan.ac.id/index.php/alihkam/article/view/271 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Hadits is the second argumentation (hujjah) source after al-<br />Qur’ân. However, there are many hadits refused becoming as an<br />argumentation. According to the perspective of a Hadîts whether<br />it is accepted or refused, it has three stages, namely shahîh,<br />hasan, and dla’îf This article focuses on the discussion of Hadîts<br />dla’îf, its argumentation and also its telling. In this relationship,<br />there are three arguments of ulama’ Hadîts related to the<br />argument of Hadîts dla’îf . Firtsly, the argument states that Hadîts<br />dla’îf cannot be applied absolutely. Secondly, Hadîts dla’îf can be<br />applied absolutely. Thirdly, Hadîts dla’îf can be used in fadla’il alamah.<br />In its telling, ulama hadits reminded people who told<br />dla’if Hadîts without sanad not to tell by redacting which<br />showed full stability that it was a Hadîts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1907-591X 2442-3084 |