Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study

Background. Proximal hypospadias, with significant curvature, is one of the most challenging anomalies. Great diversity and a large number of procedures described over the last 4 decades confirmed the fact that no single procedure has been universally accepted or successful. So, the aim of this stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Shahin, Mohamed Abdalrazek, Mohamed Abdelmaboud, Ibrahim Mahmoud Elsayaad, Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, Mahmoud Abdelhady Mousa, Ahmed Elshamy, Omar Alsamahy, Mohamed Rehan, Sayed Elhady, Ibrahim Gamaan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6996933
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562067801899008
author Mohamed Shahin
Mohamed Abdalrazek
Mohamed Abdelmaboud
Ibrahim Mahmoud Elsayaad
Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud
Mahmoud Abdelhady Mousa
Ahmed Elshamy
Omar Alsamahy
Mohamed Rehan
Sayed Elhady
Ibrahim Gamaan
author_facet Mohamed Shahin
Mohamed Abdalrazek
Mohamed Abdelmaboud
Ibrahim Mahmoud Elsayaad
Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud
Mahmoud Abdelhady Mousa
Ahmed Elshamy
Omar Alsamahy
Mohamed Rehan
Sayed Elhady
Ibrahim Gamaan
author_sort Mohamed Shahin
collection DOAJ
description Background. Proximal hypospadias, with significant curvature, is one of the most challenging anomalies. Great diversity and a large number of procedures described over the last 4 decades confirmed the fact that no single procedure has been universally accepted or successful. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate double-faced tubularized preputial flap (DFPF) versus transverse tubularized inner preputial flap (Duckett’s procedure) as regards surgical outcomes, complications rate, and cosmetic results for repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee. Patients and Methods. This was a prospective comparative study on 144 children with primary penoscrotal hypospadias with moderate or severe chordee, conducted at New Damietta and Assuit hospitals, Al-Azhar University, from March 2016 to March 2022. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups; group A (n = 72) underwent DFPF, and group B (n = 72) underwent Duckett’s procedure. Results. No significant difference was identified as regards demographic data. The follow-up period ranged from 20 to 66 months (mean of 28 months after DFPF and 31 months after Duckett’s repair), and the complication rate was 20.1% (29 of 144 children). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups as regards the urethral stricture, penile rotation, and total complication rate. HOSE score was adopted for assessment of surgical outcomes, urine stream, and cosmetic results. Conclusions. The DFPF technique is feasible and reliable for one-stage repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee and can be considered as a good option as it ensures better surgical and cosmetic outcomes with lower incidence of complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4526d9e60cd4f388d213bcd76f1b7fc
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-a4526d9e60cd4f388d213bcd76f1b7fc2025-02-03T01:23:36ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63772022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6996933Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative StudyMohamed Shahin0Mohamed Abdalrazek1Mohamed Abdelmaboud2Ibrahim Mahmoud Elsayaad3Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud4Mahmoud Abdelhady Mousa5Ahmed Elshamy6Omar Alsamahy7Mohamed Rehan8Sayed Elhady9Ibrahim Gamaan10Pediatric Surgery Unit-Department of SurgeryPediatric Surgery DepartmentPediatric Surgery DepartmentPediatric Surgery Unit-Department of SurgeryPediatric Surgery DepartmentPediatric Surgery Unit-Department of SurgeryPediatric Surgery Unit-Department of SurgeryPediatric Surgery DepartmentUrology DepartmentPediatric Surgery Unit-Department of SurgeryPediatric Surgery DepartmentBackground. Proximal hypospadias, with significant curvature, is one of the most challenging anomalies. Great diversity and a large number of procedures described over the last 4 decades confirmed the fact that no single procedure has been universally accepted or successful. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate double-faced tubularized preputial flap (DFPF) versus transverse tubularized inner preputial flap (Duckett’s procedure) as regards surgical outcomes, complications rate, and cosmetic results for repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee. Patients and Methods. This was a prospective comparative study on 144 children with primary penoscrotal hypospadias with moderate or severe chordee, conducted at New Damietta and Assuit hospitals, Al-Azhar University, from March 2016 to March 2022. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups; group A (n = 72) underwent DFPF, and group B (n = 72) underwent Duckett’s procedure. Results. No significant difference was identified as regards demographic data. The follow-up period ranged from 20 to 66 months (mean of 28 months after DFPF and 31 months after Duckett’s repair), and the complication rate was 20.1% (29 of 144 children). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups as regards the urethral stricture, penile rotation, and total complication rate. HOSE score was adopted for assessment of surgical outcomes, urine stream, and cosmetic results. Conclusions. The DFPF technique is feasible and reliable for one-stage repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee and can be considered as a good option as it ensures better surgical and cosmetic outcomes with lower incidence of complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6996933
spellingShingle Mohamed Shahin
Mohamed Abdalrazek
Mohamed Abdelmaboud
Ibrahim Mahmoud Elsayaad
Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud
Mahmoud Abdelhady Mousa
Ahmed Elshamy
Omar Alsamahy
Mohamed Rehan
Sayed Elhady
Ibrahim Gamaan
Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
Advances in Urology
title Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett’s Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of double faced tubularized preputial flap versus duckett s procedure for repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with significant penile curvature a comparative study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6996933
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedshahin evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT mohamedabdalrazek evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT mohamedabdelmaboud evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT ibrahimmahmoudelsayaad evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT muhammadabdelhafezmahmoud evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT mahmoudabdelhadymousa evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT ahmedelshamy evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT omaralsamahy evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT mohamedrehan evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT sayedelhady evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy
AT ibrahimgamaan evaluationofdoublefacedtubularizedpreputialflapversusduckettsprocedureforrepairofpenoscrotalhypospadiaswithsignificantpenilecurvatureacomparativestudy