Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours

Fans’ analysis of their creative practices and of writing generally, academics’ capture of this narrative and discursive material represent a heterogeneous collection of meta-discourses. How is this circulation of « meta » narratives and discourses expressing a reflexive thinking about writing? We f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Céline Masoni Lacroix
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et Sociétés 2017-12-01
Series:Cahiers de Narratologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/7781
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850110208124125184
author Céline Masoni Lacroix
author_facet Céline Masoni Lacroix
author_sort Céline Masoni Lacroix
collection DOAJ
description Fans’ analysis of their creative practices and of writing generally, academics’ capture of this narrative and discursive material represent a heterogeneous collection of meta-discourses. How is this circulation of « meta » narratives and discourses expressing a reflexive thinking about writing? We focus on a discursive spread as a fragmentation-organization process, which does not bring into conflict fans and academics’ metanarratives and metadiscourses, but apprehends a binding dichotomy or a co-extensive principle (Masoni Lacroix & Cailler, 2016), which expose this multiplicity. We stress on an emancipating-(re)normalizing movement of writing, named met@ttachment, as a constitutive principle of fannish narrativities, having an effect on scientific writing.
format Article
id doaj-art-a447cbcc5b5b40a1aeb5780629a3b5ae
institution OA Journals
issn 0993-8516
1765-307X
language fra
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et Sociétés
record_format Article
series Cahiers de Narratologie
spelling doaj-art-a447cbcc5b5b40a1aeb5780629a3b5ae2025-08-20T02:37:53ZfraLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et SociétésCahiers de Narratologie0993-85161765-307X2017-12-013210.4000/narratologie.7781Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscoursCéline Masoni LacroixFans’ analysis of their creative practices and of writing generally, academics’ capture of this narrative and discursive material represent a heterogeneous collection of meta-discourses. How is this circulation of « meta » narratives and discourses expressing a reflexive thinking about writing? We focus on a discursive spread as a fragmentation-organization process, which does not bring into conflict fans and academics’ metanarratives and metadiscourses, but apprehends a binding dichotomy or a co-extensive principle (Masoni Lacroix & Cailler, 2016), which expose this multiplicity. We stress on an emancipating-(re)normalizing movement of writing, named met@ttachment, as a constitutive principle of fannish narrativities, having an effect on scientific writing.https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/7781reading-writing fans’ practicesnarrativitiesbinding dichotomymet@ttachmentBuffy the Vampire Slayer
spellingShingle Céline Masoni Lacroix
Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
Cahiers de Narratologie
reading-writing fans’ practices
narrativities
binding dichotomy
met@ttachment
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
title Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
title_full Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
title_fullStr Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
title_full_unstemmed Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
title_short Narrativités 2.0 : fragmentation-organisation d’un métadiscours
title_sort narrativites 2 0 fragmentation organisation d un metadiscours
topic reading-writing fans’ practices
narrativities
binding dichotomy
met@ttachment
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
url https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/7781
work_keys_str_mv AT celinemasonilacroix narrativites20fragmentationorganisationdunmetadiscours