Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.

This paper demonstrates how two different methods used to calculate population-level mobility from Call Detail Records (CDR) produce varying predictions of the spread of epidemics informed by these data. Our findings are based on one CDR dataset describing inter-district movement in Ghana in 2021, p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamish Gibbs, Anwar Musah, Omar Seidu, William Ampofo, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Jonathan Gray, Wole A Adewole, James Cheshire, Michael Marks, Rosalind M Eggo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-08-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011368&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850162863352578048
author Hamish Gibbs
Anwar Musah
Omar Seidu
William Ampofo
Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe
Jonathan Gray
Wole A Adewole
James Cheshire
Michael Marks
Rosalind M Eggo
author_facet Hamish Gibbs
Anwar Musah
Omar Seidu
William Ampofo
Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe
Jonathan Gray
Wole A Adewole
James Cheshire
Michael Marks
Rosalind M Eggo
author_sort Hamish Gibbs
collection DOAJ
description This paper demonstrates how two different methods used to calculate population-level mobility from Call Detail Records (CDR) produce varying predictions of the spread of epidemics informed by these data. Our findings are based on one CDR dataset describing inter-district movement in Ghana in 2021, produced using two different aggregation methodologies. One methodology, "all pairs," is designed to retain long distance network connections while the other, "sequential" methodology is designed to accurately reflect the volume of travel between locations. We show how the choice of methodology feeds through models of human mobility to the predictions of a metapopulation SEIR model of disease transmission. We also show that this impact varies depending on the location of pathogen introduction and the transmissibility of infections. For central locations or highly transmissible diseases, we do not observe significant differences between aggregation methodologies on the predicted spread of disease. For less transmissible diseases or those introduced into remote locations, we find that the choice of aggregation methodology influences the speed of spatial spread as well as the size of the peak number of infections in individual districts. Our findings can help researchers and users of epidemiological models to understand how methodological choices at the level of model inputs may influence the results of models of infectious disease transmission, as well as the circumstances in which these choices do not alter model predictions.
format Article
id doaj-art-a40ff86aa29943ab9e11aa6115d95e93
institution OA Journals
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj-art-a40ff86aa29943ab9e11aa6115d95e932025-08-20T02:22:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582023-08-01198e101136810.1371/journal.pcbi.1011368Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.Hamish GibbsAnwar MusahOmar SeiduWilliam AmpofoFranklin Asiedu-BekoeJonathan GrayWole A AdewoleJames CheshireMichael MarksRosalind M EggoThis paper demonstrates how two different methods used to calculate population-level mobility from Call Detail Records (CDR) produce varying predictions of the spread of epidemics informed by these data. Our findings are based on one CDR dataset describing inter-district movement in Ghana in 2021, produced using two different aggregation methodologies. One methodology, "all pairs," is designed to retain long distance network connections while the other, "sequential" methodology is designed to accurately reflect the volume of travel between locations. We show how the choice of methodology feeds through models of human mobility to the predictions of a metapopulation SEIR model of disease transmission. We also show that this impact varies depending on the location of pathogen introduction and the transmissibility of infections. For central locations or highly transmissible diseases, we do not observe significant differences between aggregation methodologies on the predicted spread of disease. For less transmissible diseases or those introduced into remote locations, we find that the choice of aggregation methodology influences the speed of spatial spread as well as the size of the peak number of infections in individual districts. Our findings can help researchers and users of epidemiological models to understand how methodological choices at the level of model inputs may influence the results of models of infectious disease transmission, as well as the circumstances in which these choices do not alter model predictions.https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011368&type=printable
spellingShingle Hamish Gibbs
Anwar Musah
Omar Seidu
William Ampofo
Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe
Jonathan Gray
Wole A Adewole
James Cheshire
Michael Marks
Rosalind M Eggo
Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
title_full Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
title_fullStr Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
title_full_unstemmed Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
title_short Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility.
title_sort call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility
url https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011368&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT hamishgibbs calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT anwarmusah calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT omarseidu calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT williamampofo calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT franklinasiedubekoe calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT jonathangray calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT woleaadewole calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT jamescheshire calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT michaelmarks calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility
AT rosalindmeggo calldetailrecordaggregationmethodologyimpactsinfectiousdiseasemodelsinformedbyhumanmobility