The Impact of Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Grading Systems on Students’ Course-Related Expectations

The present study examined how information about different grading systems affects students’ course expectations, particularly in ways that may have downstream consequences for learning and other academic outcomes.   In an online experiment using a preregistered design, we prompted two samples of c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingxuan Liu, Michelle Wong, Bridgette Hard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/35434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study examined how information about different grading systems affects students’ course expectations, particularly in ways that may have downstream consequences for learning and other academic outcomes.   In an online experiment using a preregistered design, we prompted two samples of current and recent college students (N = 547) with a hypothetical course that adopted either a norm- or criterion-referenced grading system, two common grading policies in higher education. We then examined students’ expectations for their own course-related goals, perceptions, and behaviors. We found that, compared to criterion-referenced grading, norm-referenced grading led participants to expect higher performance-goal orientation, lower mastery-goal orientation, lower course self-efficacy, and fewer help-related behaviors. Norm-referenced grading also increased perceptions that the instructor believes intelligence to be nonuniversal and fixed (i.e., not malleable). Some effects of grading system were stronger for students from non-minoritized backgrounds and lacking prior experience with the assigned grading system. Although participants reported experiencing criterion-referenced grading more often in college, both grading policies were commonly experienced by participants. Our findings suggest that norm-referenced grading policies negatively impact student expectations. More broadly, these findings highlight the importance of grading policies in shaping students' course-related expectations.
ISSN:1527-9316