Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri

In order to cope with the negative effects of television, parents may restrict the use of television by their children. This kind of mediation is called “restrictive mediation” in the literature. In this study, in order to figure out the forms and “why”s of restrictive mediation, four families with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melike Türkan BAĞLI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ankara University 2003-05-01
Series:Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/auebfd/issue/38407/445458?publisher=ankara
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850086925024624640
author Melike Türkan BAĞLI
author_facet Melike Türkan BAĞLI
author_sort Melike Türkan BAĞLI
collection DOAJ
description In order to cope with the negative effects of television, parents may restrict the use of television by their children. This kind of mediation is called “restrictive mediation” in the literature. In this study, in order to figure out the forms and “why”s of restrictive mediation, four families with preschool age children were visited in their homes and observed in the natural flow of their daily lives by the researcher. After the visits were completed, the researcher conducted interviews with parents on the details of their attitudes and regulations on television viewing and other aspects of their family life. The results indicated that the parents used direct and indirect ways to restrict their children’s television viewing. Forming and stating rules about viewing and restricting while explaining the reasons for restriction were among the direct restrictive mediations. It was seen that restricting without allowing children to know that they are restricted was carried out as a way of indirect restrictive mediation. The other indirect restrictive mediation ways were (a) offering alternative programs, channels or activities substituting the actual program or channel viewed, (b) implying that the reasons of the rules were different than the real ones, (c) pretending that source of the rules was not the parents themselves. Spatial restrictiveness (by regulating physical characteristics of their homes) and manipulating third persons (by telling what to do to other persons than the parent who tried to restrict) seemed the efforts to create an appropriate atmosphere for restriction. The reasons for restriction were the television content covering violence, sex and bad language
format Article
id doaj-art-a3c19f151d7a487fb9873c27cf697037
institution DOAJ
issn 1301-3718
2458-8342
language English
publishDate 2003-05-01
publisher Ankara University
record_format Article
series Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-a3c19f151d7a487fb9873c27cf6970372025-08-20T02:43:20ZengAnkara UniversityAnkara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi1301-37182458-83422003-05-0136112914945Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleriMelike Türkan BAĞLI0Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Eğitimde Psikolojik Hizmetler Anabilim DalıIn order to cope with the negative effects of television, parents may restrict the use of television by their children. This kind of mediation is called “restrictive mediation” in the literature. In this study, in order to figure out the forms and “why”s of restrictive mediation, four families with preschool age children were visited in their homes and observed in the natural flow of their daily lives by the researcher. After the visits were completed, the researcher conducted interviews with parents on the details of their attitudes and regulations on television viewing and other aspects of their family life. The results indicated that the parents used direct and indirect ways to restrict their children’s television viewing. Forming and stating rules about viewing and restricting while explaining the reasons for restriction were among the direct restrictive mediations. It was seen that restricting without allowing children to know that they are restricted was carried out as a way of indirect restrictive mediation. The other indirect restrictive mediation ways were (a) offering alternative programs, channels or activities substituting the actual program or channel viewed, (b) implying that the reasons of the rules were different than the real ones, (c) pretending that source of the rules was not the parents themselves. Spatial restrictiveness (by regulating physical characteristics of their homes) and manipulating third persons (by telling what to do to other persons than the parent who tried to restrict) seemed the efforts to create an appropriate atmosphere for restriction. The reasons for restriction were the television content covering violence, sex and bad languagehttp://dergipark.gov.tr/auebfd/issue/38407/445458?publisher=ankaraTelevision and family preschool children parental mediation restrictive mediation
spellingShingle Melike Türkan BAĞLI
Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
Television and family
preschool children
parental mediation
restrictive mediation
title Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
title_full Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
title_fullStr Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
title_full_unstemmed Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
title_short Televizyona karşı anababa aracılığı: Kısıtlayıcı aracılığın biçimleri
title_sort televizyona karsi anababa araciligi kisitlayici araciligin bicimleri
topic Television and family
preschool children
parental mediation
restrictive mediation
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/auebfd/issue/38407/445458?publisher=ankara
work_keys_str_mv AT meliketurkanbagli televizyonakarsıanababaaracılıgıkısıtlayıcıaracılıgınbicimleri