Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?

Aim. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations.General findings. Reflux esophagitis in the association with hiatal hernia on the third place in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. The development of minimally invasive surgical tech...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. N. Komarov, S. V. Osminin, I. R. Bilyalov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Gastro LLC 2022-05-01
Series:Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/584
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860065448230912
author R. N. Komarov
S. V. Osminin
I. R. Bilyalov
author_facet R. N. Komarov
S. V. Osminin
I. R. Bilyalov
author_sort R. N. Komarov
collection DOAJ
description Aim. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations.General findings. Reflux esophagitis in the association with hiatal hernia on the third place in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. The development of minimally invasive surgical technologies has led to an increase in the number of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations. The literature review includes 12 studies, the results of which were published from 2002 to 2020, with a total number of patients 1633. In most of them, when comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations, the advantages of one or another technique were not revealed. In some studies, the high cost and duration of the operation were noted when using the da Vinci robotic surgical complex. Other studies have reported possible improvements in the treatment outcomes of patients with large or recurrent hiatal hernias due to the high precision of movement and improved visualization characteristic of therobot-assisted surgeries.Conclusion. It is necessary to conduct more researches on this problem to develop indications for the choice of a particular surgical approach, as well as to create a single transparent algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia.
format Article
id doaj-art-a333acfc6bd64649a85df51b15d4dfb5
institution Kabale University
issn 1382-4376
2658-6673
language Russian
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Gastro LLC
record_format Article
series Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
spelling doaj-art-a333acfc6bd64649a85df51b15d4dfb52025-02-10T16:14:37ZrusGastro LLCРоссийский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии1382-43762658-66732022-05-01321152310.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-1-15-23460Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?R. N. Komarov0S. V. Osminin1I. R. Bilyalov2Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Aim. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations.General findings. Reflux esophagitis in the association with hiatal hernia on the third place in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. The development of minimally invasive surgical technologies has led to an increase in the number of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations. The literature review includes 12 studies, the results of which were published from 2002 to 2020, with a total number of patients 1633. In most of them, when comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations, the advantages of one or another technique were not revealed. In some studies, the high cost and duration of the operation were noted when using the da Vinci robotic surgical complex. Other studies have reported possible improvements in the treatment outcomes of patients with large or recurrent hiatal hernias due to the high precision of movement and improved visualization characteristic of therobot-assisted surgeries.Conclusion. It is necessary to conduct more researches on this problem to develop indications for the choice of a particular surgical approach, as well as to create a single transparent algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia.https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/584robot-assisted fundoplicationda vinci robotic surgeryhiatal herniareflux esophagitis
spellingShingle R. N. Komarov
S. V. Osminin
I. R. Bilyalov
Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
robot-assisted fundoplication
da vinci robotic surgery
hiatal hernia
reflux esophagitis
title Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
title_full Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
title_fullStr Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
title_full_unstemmed Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
title_short Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?
title_sort hiatal hernia surgery laparoscopic versus robotic approach
topic robot-assisted fundoplication
da vinci robotic surgery
hiatal hernia
reflux esophagitis
url https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/584
work_keys_str_mv AT rnkomarov hiatalherniasurgerylaparoscopicversusroboticapproach
AT svosminin hiatalherniasurgerylaparoscopicversusroboticapproach
AT irbilyalov hiatalherniasurgerylaparoscopicversusroboticapproach