Appropriate randomization, adherence to Ethics board approved trial protocol and transparent reporting of amendments and exclusions define RCT integrity
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | David Eckerdal, Hendrik Pakosta, Muhanned Ali, Isam Atroshi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bioscientifica
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | EFORT Open Reviews |
| Online Access: | https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/10/7/EOR-2025-0029.xml |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Transparency in Agriculture and Natural Resources: Defining Transparent Communication
by: Joy N. Rumble
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Transparency in Agriculture and Natural Resources: Defining Transparent Communication
by: Joy N. Rumble
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Algorithm for Key Transparency with Transparent Logs [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
by: Shasivar Rexhepi, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Supporting antiretroviral therapy uptake and adherence: the SUPA research programme and RCT
by: Rob Horne, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Ethical Committee Conundrum: Does Third-Party Approval Provide the Transparency we Desire?
by: Dhrithi Mushthi, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01)