Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is considered one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Early detection is critical for effective management. This study aims to assess the utility of ultrasonography (US) and mammography (MG) in detecting BC features. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi, Amal A. Alareqi, Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Kamal D. Alsultan, Amel F. Alzain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1225_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858138598604800
author Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi
Amal A. Alareqi
Moawia Gameraddin
Awadia Gareeballah
Kamal D. Alsultan
Amel F. Alzain
author_facet Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi
Amal A. Alareqi
Moawia Gameraddin
Awadia Gareeballah
Kamal D. Alsultan
Amel F. Alzain
author_sort Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is considered one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Early detection is critical for effective management. This study aims to assess the utility of ultrasonography (US) and mammography (MG) in detecting BC features. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved the electronic records of 263 female patients diagnosed with BC. The mean age was 45.71 ± 12.25 years (17–90 years). A cross-tabulation test was performed to correlate the presence of each malignant feature (Yes/No) on both US and MG and the final ultrasonography diagnosis (benign/malignant). The compatibility between the presence of each feature on both imaging techniques was measured by the percentage of agreement in reporting the feature that was reported as Kappa. The sensitivity and specificity for each feature were calculated, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to measure the area under the curve for each feature on both modalities. Results: The strong compatibility between the two techniques was 87.1%, 94.29%, 66.92%, 79.85%, 77.56%, 77.18, and 79.84% for irregular shape, uncircumscribed, spiculated margins, tissue distortion, nipple retraction, skin thickening, and the presence of lymphadenopathy, respectively (P < 0.001). Boxplots show that the sensitivity of the US ranged from 37% to 95%, and the specificity ranged from 27% to 91%. However, MG’s sensitivity ranged from 44% to 93%, and the specificity ranged from 36% to 73%. Conclusion: US and MG images show similar morphological changes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in breast lesions. US characterizes echogenicity, provides real-time imaging, and uses color and pulsed Doppler techniques for vascularity and lymphadenopathy detection, while MG is better for identifying different calcification types.
format Article
id doaj-art-a30d684648de4153b40d6ff4b7818132
institution Kabale University
issn 2249-4863
2278-7135
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj-art-a30d684648de4153b40d6ff4b78181322025-02-11T13:55:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632278-71352025-01-0114134134710.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1225_24Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancerSultan Abdulwadoud AlshoabiAmal A. AlareqiMoawia GameraddinAwadia GareeballahKamal D. AlsultanAmel F. AlzainIntroduction: Breast cancer (BC) is considered one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Early detection is critical for effective management. This study aims to assess the utility of ultrasonography (US) and mammography (MG) in detecting BC features. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved the electronic records of 263 female patients diagnosed with BC. The mean age was 45.71 ± 12.25 years (17–90 years). A cross-tabulation test was performed to correlate the presence of each malignant feature (Yes/No) on both US and MG and the final ultrasonography diagnosis (benign/malignant). The compatibility between the presence of each feature on both imaging techniques was measured by the percentage of agreement in reporting the feature that was reported as Kappa. The sensitivity and specificity for each feature were calculated, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to measure the area under the curve for each feature on both modalities. Results: The strong compatibility between the two techniques was 87.1%, 94.29%, 66.92%, 79.85%, 77.56%, 77.18, and 79.84% for irregular shape, uncircumscribed, spiculated margins, tissue distortion, nipple retraction, skin thickening, and the presence of lymphadenopathy, respectively (P < 0.001). Boxplots show that the sensitivity of the US ranged from 37% to 95%, and the specificity ranged from 27% to 91%. However, MG’s sensitivity ranged from 44% to 93%, and the specificity ranged from 36% to 73%. Conclusion: US and MG images show similar morphological changes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in breast lesions. US characterizes echogenicity, provides real-time imaging, and uses color and pulsed Doppler techniques for vascularity and lymphadenopathy detection, while MG is better for identifying different calcification types.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1225_24breast cancerirregular shape of breast lesionmammographyspiculated margins of breast lesionultrasonography
spellingShingle Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi
Amal A. Alareqi
Moawia Gameraddin
Awadia Gareeballah
Kamal D. Alsultan
Amel F. Alzain
Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
breast cancer
irregular shape of breast lesion
mammography
spiculated margins of breast lesion
ultrasonography
title Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
title_full Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
title_short Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
title_sort efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer
topic breast cancer
irregular shape of breast lesion
mammography
spiculated margins of breast lesion
ultrasonography
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1225_24
work_keys_str_mv AT sultanabdulwadoudalshoabi efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer
AT amalaalareqi efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer
AT moawiagameraddin efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer
AT awadiagareeballah efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer
AT kamaldalsultan efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer
AT amelfalzain efficacyofultrasonographyandmammographyindetectingfeaturesofbreastcancer