Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations

Background Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients are under-represented in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients who did and did not participate in a randomised trial of invasive versus non-invasive management (CABG-ACS).Methods ACS patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark C Petrie, Colin Berry, Kenneth Mangion, Alex McConnachie, Ian Ford, Olivia Wu, Paul Rocchiccioli, Aadil Shaukat, Matthew M Y Lee, Joanne Simpson, Colette E Jackson, David S Corcoran, Ammani Brown, Pio Cialdella, Novalia P Sidik, Margaret B McEntegart, Alan P Rae, Stuart H M Hood, Eileen E Peat, Iain N Findlay, Clare L Murphy, Alistair J Cormack, Nikolay B Bukov, Kanarath P Balachandran, Sarah J E Barry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Open Heart
Online Access:https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001453.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846170658820587520
author Mark C Petrie
Colin Berry
Kenneth Mangion
Alex McConnachie
Ian Ford
Olivia Wu
Paul Rocchiccioli
Aadil Shaukat
Matthew M Y Lee
Joanne Simpson
Colette E Jackson
David S Corcoran
Ammani Brown
Pio Cialdella
Novalia P Sidik
Margaret B McEntegart
Alan P Rae
Stuart H M Hood
Eileen E Peat
Iain N Findlay
Clare L Murphy
Alistair J Cormack
Nikolay B Bukov
Kanarath P Balachandran
Sarah J E Barry
author_facet Mark C Petrie
Colin Berry
Kenneth Mangion
Alex McConnachie
Ian Ford
Olivia Wu
Paul Rocchiccioli
Aadil Shaukat
Matthew M Y Lee
Joanne Simpson
Colette E Jackson
David S Corcoran
Ammani Brown
Pio Cialdella
Novalia P Sidik
Margaret B McEntegart
Alan P Rae
Stuart H M Hood
Eileen E Peat
Iain N Findlay
Clare L Murphy
Alistair J Cormack
Nikolay B Bukov
Kanarath P Balachandran
Sarah J E Barry
author_sort Mark C Petrie
collection DOAJ
description Background Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients are under-represented in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients who did and did not participate in a randomised trial of invasive versus non-invasive management (CABG-ACS).Methods ACS patients with prior CABG in four hospitals were randomised to invasive or non-invasive management. Non-randomised patients entered a registry. Primary efficacy (composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalisation for refractory ischaemia/angina, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure) and safety outcomes (composite of bleeding, stroke, procedure-related MI, worsening renal function) were independently adjudicated.Results Of 217 patients screened, 84 (39%) screenfailed, of whom 24 (29%) did not consent and 60 (71%) were ineligible. Of 133 (61%) eligible, 60 (mean±SD age, 71±9 years, 72% male) entered the trial and 73 (age, 72±10 years, 73% male) entered a registry (preferences: physician (79%), patient (38%), both (21%)).Compared with trial participants, registry patients had more valve disease, lower haemoglobin, worse New York Heart Association class and higher frailty.At baseline, invasive management was performed in 52% and 49% trial and registry patients, respectively, of whom 32% and 36% had percutaneous coronary intervention at baseline, respectively (p=0.800). After 2 years follow-up (694 (median, IQR 558–841) days), primary efficacy (43% trial vs 49% registry (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.89)) and safety outcomes (28% trial vs 22% registry (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.46)) were similar. EuroQol was lower in registry patients at 1 year.Conclusions Compared with trial participants, registry participants had excess morbidity, but longer-term outcomes were similar.Trial registration number NCT01895751.
format Article
id doaj-art-a30408dbdabd43f096f53dc0fae821a9
institution Kabale University
issn 2053-3624
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Open Heart
spelling doaj-art-a30408dbdabd43f096f53dc0fae821a92024-11-11T13:10:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupOpen Heart2053-36242021-02-018110.1136/openhrt-2020-001453Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populationsMark C Petrie0Colin Berry1Kenneth Mangion2Alex McConnachie3Ian Ford4Olivia Wu5Paul Rocchiccioli6Aadil Shaukat7Matthew M Y Lee8Joanne Simpson9Colette E Jackson10David S Corcoran11Ammani Brown12Pio Cialdella13Novalia P Sidik14Margaret B McEntegart15Alan P Rae16Stuart H M Hood17Eileen E Peat18Iain N Findlay19Clare L Murphy20Alistair J Cormack21Nikolay B Bukov22Kanarath P Balachandran23Sarah J E Barry24School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK27 BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK2University of GlasgowHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon St, Clydebank, Glasgow, GLG G81 4DY, UK1Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon St, Clydebank, Glasgow, GLG G81 4DY, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK4 Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK2 West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK1 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK2 West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK5 Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK5 Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK5 Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK6 Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK6 Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK9 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UKBackground Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients are under-represented in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients who did and did not participate in a randomised trial of invasive versus non-invasive management (CABG-ACS).Methods ACS patients with prior CABG in four hospitals were randomised to invasive or non-invasive management. Non-randomised patients entered a registry. Primary efficacy (composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalisation for refractory ischaemia/angina, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure) and safety outcomes (composite of bleeding, stroke, procedure-related MI, worsening renal function) were independently adjudicated.Results Of 217 patients screened, 84 (39%) screenfailed, of whom 24 (29%) did not consent and 60 (71%) were ineligible. Of 133 (61%) eligible, 60 (mean±SD age, 71±9 years, 72% male) entered the trial and 73 (age, 72±10 years, 73% male) entered a registry (preferences: physician (79%), patient (38%), both (21%)).Compared with trial participants, registry patients had more valve disease, lower haemoglobin, worse New York Heart Association class and higher frailty.At baseline, invasive management was performed in 52% and 49% trial and registry patients, respectively, of whom 32% and 36% had percutaneous coronary intervention at baseline, respectively (p=0.800). After 2 years follow-up (694 (median, IQR 558–841) days), primary efficacy (43% trial vs 49% registry (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.89)) and safety outcomes (28% trial vs 22% registry (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.46)) were similar. EuroQol was lower in registry patients at 1 year.Conclusions Compared with trial participants, registry participants had excess morbidity, but longer-term outcomes were similar.Trial registration number NCT01895751.https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001453.full
spellingShingle Mark C Petrie
Colin Berry
Kenneth Mangion
Alex McConnachie
Ian Ford
Olivia Wu
Paul Rocchiccioli
Aadil Shaukat
Matthew M Y Lee
Joanne Simpson
Colette E Jackson
David S Corcoran
Ammani Brown
Pio Cialdella
Novalia P Sidik
Margaret B McEntegart
Alan P Rae
Stuart H M Hood
Eileen E Peat
Iain N Findlay
Clare L Murphy
Alistair J Cormack
Nikolay B Bukov
Kanarath P Balachandran
Sarah J E Barry
Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
Open Heart
title Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
title_full Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
title_fullStr Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
title_full_unstemmed Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
title_short Invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass (CABG-ACS): insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
title_sort invasive versus medically managed acute coronary syndromes with prior bypass cabg acs insights into the registry versus randomised trial populations
url https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001453.full
work_keys_str_mv AT markcpetrie invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT colinberry invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT kennethmangion invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT alexmcconnachie invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT ianford invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT oliviawu invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT paulrocchiccioli invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT aadilshaukat invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT matthewmylee invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT joannesimpson invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT coletteejackson invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT davidscorcoran invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT ammanibrown invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT piocialdella invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT novaliapsidik invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT margaretbmcentegart invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT alanprae invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT stuarthmhood invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT eileenepeat invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT iainnfindlay invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT clarelmurphy invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT alistairjcormack invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT nikolaybbukov invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT kanarathpbalachandran invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations
AT sarahjebarry invasiveversusmedicallymanagedacutecoronarysyndromeswithpriorbypasscabgacsinsightsintotheregistryversusrandomisedtrialpopulations