Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review

Abstract Introduction Few studies have described obstetric and critical care outcomes in pregnant women with COVID‐19 needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Material and methods Obstetric and critical care outcomes of COVID‐19 women admitted to eight ICUs from April 1, 2020 to September 15, 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kailash Bhatia, Malachy Columb, Bhaskar Narayan, Anthony Wilson, Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL‐GM) Study Collaborators
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14681
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850211986817679360
author Kailash Bhatia
Malachy Columb
Bhaskar Narayan
Anthony Wilson
Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL‐GM) Study Collaborators
author_facet Kailash Bhatia
Malachy Columb
Bhaskar Narayan
Anthony Wilson
Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL‐GM) Study Collaborators
author_sort Kailash Bhatia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Few studies have described obstetric and critical care outcomes in pregnant women with COVID‐19 needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Material and methods Obstetric and critical care outcomes of COVID‐19 women admitted to eight ICUs from April 1, 2020 to September 15, 2021, in the North West of England were retrospectively analyzed. Women admitted to ICU were assigned to three groups: antepartum women discharged from ICU prior to delivery (antepartum ICU‐discharged group), antepartum women who had expedited delivery (antepartum ICU‐delivered group) and a postpartum group. Our aims were to describe maternal characteristics and assess how delivery influenced the obstetric and critical care outcomes in these women. Results During the study period, 615 women tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), of whom 62 (10.1%) needed ICU admission due to symptomatic COVID‐19. Pregnancy loss (3.2%) was recorded in two women. Detailed obstetric and critical outcomes from 60 women are reported. Nine antepartum women (15%) admitted to ICU were discharged and continued their pregnancy, 13 antepartum women (21.7%) had expedited delivery by cesarean birth after ICU admission and 38 (63.3%) women were admitted to ICU during the postpartum period. Antepartum ICU‐discharged women contracted the SARS‐CoV‐2 at an earlier median gestational age (23 weeks; p = 0.0003) and needed ICU admission at an earlier median gestational age (28 weeks, p = 0.03) compared with antepartum ICU‐delivered (28 and 32 weeks) and postpartum women (35.5 and 36 weeks). Antepartum ICU‐discharged women had the lowest rate of mechanical ventilation receipt (11.1%) compared with antepartum ICU‐delivered women (52.3%) and postpartum women (44.3%) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). No significant differences were observed in the frequency and severity of critical care complications in the antepartum ICU‐discharged, antepartum‐ICU delivered and postpartum women. Conclusions Of the women admitted to ICU antepartum, 40% were discharged while remaining pregnant and 60% had expedited delivery. Antepartum women who were discharged from ICU without giving birth may receive lower rates of mechanical ventilation than those who delivered in ICU or admitted postpartum; however, further studies are needed to confirm or refute this association.
format Article
id doaj-art-a2b2358eac3c4974af90bcbbb28bd0c8
institution OA Journals
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-a2b2358eac3c4974af90bcbbb28bd0c82025-08-20T02:09:25ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122023-12-01102121719172910.1111/aogs.14681Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective reviewKailash Bhatia0Malachy Columb1Bhaskar Narayan2Anthony Wilson3Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL‐GM) Study CollaboratorsDepartment of Anesthesia and Peri‐operative Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UKDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UKManchester Royal Infirmary Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UKUniversity of Manchester Manchester UKAbstract Introduction Few studies have described obstetric and critical care outcomes in pregnant women with COVID‐19 needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Material and methods Obstetric and critical care outcomes of COVID‐19 women admitted to eight ICUs from April 1, 2020 to September 15, 2021, in the North West of England were retrospectively analyzed. Women admitted to ICU were assigned to three groups: antepartum women discharged from ICU prior to delivery (antepartum ICU‐discharged group), antepartum women who had expedited delivery (antepartum ICU‐delivered group) and a postpartum group. Our aims were to describe maternal characteristics and assess how delivery influenced the obstetric and critical care outcomes in these women. Results During the study period, 615 women tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), of whom 62 (10.1%) needed ICU admission due to symptomatic COVID‐19. Pregnancy loss (3.2%) was recorded in two women. Detailed obstetric and critical outcomes from 60 women are reported. Nine antepartum women (15%) admitted to ICU were discharged and continued their pregnancy, 13 antepartum women (21.7%) had expedited delivery by cesarean birth after ICU admission and 38 (63.3%) women were admitted to ICU during the postpartum period. Antepartum ICU‐discharged women contracted the SARS‐CoV‐2 at an earlier median gestational age (23 weeks; p = 0.0003) and needed ICU admission at an earlier median gestational age (28 weeks, p = 0.03) compared with antepartum ICU‐delivered (28 and 32 weeks) and postpartum women (35.5 and 36 weeks). Antepartum ICU‐discharged women had the lowest rate of mechanical ventilation receipt (11.1%) compared with antepartum ICU‐delivered women (52.3%) and postpartum women (44.3%) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). No significant differences were observed in the frequency and severity of critical care complications in the antepartum ICU‐discharged, antepartum‐ICU delivered and postpartum women. Conclusions Of the women admitted to ICU antepartum, 40% were discharged while remaining pregnant and 60% had expedited delivery. Antepartum women who were discharged from ICU without giving birth may receive lower rates of mechanical ventilation than those who delivered in ICU or admitted postpartum; however, further studies are needed to confirm or refute this association.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14681cesareanCOVID‐19critical careinvasive ventilationnon‐invasive ventilationpregnancy
spellingShingle Kailash Bhatia
Malachy Columb
Bhaskar Narayan
Anthony Wilson
Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL‐GM) Study Collaborators
Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
cesarean
COVID‐19
critical care
invasive ventilation
non‐invasive ventilation
pregnancy
title Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
title_full Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
title_fullStr Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
title_short Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review
title_sort critical care maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with covid 19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the north west of england a retrospective review
topic cesarean
COVID‐19
critical care
invasive ventilation
non‐invasive ventilation
pregnancy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14681
work_keys_str_mv AT kailashbhatia criticalcarematernalandneonataloutcomesofpregnantwomenwithcovid19admittedtoeightintensivecareunitsduringthewildtypealphaanddeltawavesofthepandemicacrossthenorthwestofenglandaretrospectivereview
AT malachycolumb criticalcarematernalandneonataloutcomesofpregnantwomenwithcovid19admittedtoeightintensivecareunitsduringthewildtypealphaanddeltawavesofthepandemicacrossthenorthwestofenglandaretrospectivereview
AT bhaskarnarayan criticalcarematernalandneonataloutcomesofpregnantwomenwithcovid19admittedtoeightintensivecareunitsduringthewildtypealphaanddeltawavesofthepandemicacrossthenorthwestofenglandaretrospectivereview
AT anthonywilson criticalcarematernalandneonataloutcomesofpregnantwomenwithcovid19admittedtoeightintensivecareunitsduringthewildtypealphaanddeltawavesofthepandemicacrossthenorthwestofenglandaretrospectivereview
AT groupofobstetricanesthetistsoflancashiregreatermanchesterandmerseygoalgmstudycollaborators criticalcarematernalandneonataloutcomesofpregnantwomenwithcovid19admittedtoeightintensivecareunitsduringthewildtypealphaanddeltawavesofthepandemicacrossthenorthwestofenglandaretrospectivereview